MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3216624362 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-147333

Clinical Activity of CC-99282, a Novel, Oral Small Molecule Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator (CELMoD) Agent, in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL) - First Results from a Phase 1, Open-Label Study

2021· article· en· W3216624362 sur OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Marie Michot, Julio C. Chávez, Cecilia Carpio, Silvia Ferrari, Tatyana Feldman, Daniel Morillo, John Kuruvilla, Antonio Pinto, Vincent Ribrag, Emmanuel Bachy, Tonia J. Buchholz, Soraya Carrancio, Carla Guarinós, Fan Wu, Shaoyi Li, Poliana Patah, Michael Pourdehnad, Loretta J. Nastoupil

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLenalidomideTolerabilityInternal medicineLymphomaFollicular lymphomaCereblonOncologyPharmacologyAdverse effectMultiple myelomaBiologyUbiquitin ligase

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract CC-99282 is a novel, small molecule CELMoD ® agent that co-opts cereblon to induce targeted degradation of Ikaros/Aiolos, transcription factors critical for development of B-cell malignancies. Lopez-Girona et al. reported that in preclinical models, compared with lenalidomide and other immunomodulatory agents, CC-99282 showed similar immunostimulatory effects and stronger antitumor activity along with robust distribution across multiple tissues. In addition, CC-99282 was shown to exhibit 10- to 100-fold enhanced antiproliferative and apoptotic activity in a range of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines, independent of subtype or chemotherapy-resistant status (Lopez-Girona, et al. Hematol Oncol. 2021). Here, we present results from CC-99282-NHL-001, a phase 1, open-label, dose-finding, first-in-human study evaluating CC-99282 in pts with R/R NHL (NCT03930953). This multicenter study consists of 2 parts, dose escalation of CC-99282 monotherapy (part A) and expansion with or without combination partners (part B). Part A includes pts with R/R DLBCL or follicular lymphoma (FL) who have progressed after ≥ 2 lines of therapy, including prior CELMoD agent and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR T), or pts with R/R DLBCL who received ≥ 1 lines of standard therapy and are unfit for transplant. Pts receive oral CC-99282 (0.2 mg, 0.4 mg, 0.6 mg, or 0.8 mg) once daily following 3 different intermittent dosing schedules of 28-day cycles, with ≥ 3 pts in each dosing cohort. Primary objectives are to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and/or the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D); secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of CC-99282 monotherapy in pts with R/R NHL. The pharmacodynamics (PD) of CC-99282 in R/R NHL is an exploratory endpoint. As of April 9, 2021, 35 eligible pts were treated in part A (30 DLBCL and 5 FL). Median age was 66 (range 35-81) years and 57% were male. Median number of prior anticancer therapies was 3 (range 1-8); 7 (20%) pts had received CAR T, 7 (20%) had received prior stem cell transplants, and 20 (57%) were refractory to last treatment. Median treatment duration was 8 (range 4-72) weeks, and at time of analysis 8 (23%) pts were still on treatment and 22 (63%) had discontinued treatment because of progressive disease. Twenty-one (60%) pts had a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of grade 3/4 related to CC-99282, the most common being neutropenia (19 pts [54%]), thrombocytopenia (3 pts [9%]), and febrile neutropenia (2 pts [6%]). Dose-limiting toxicities observed have been hematologic TEAEs and the MTD has not been reached. Management of neutropenia included dose reductions and/or interruptions, and prophylaxis or treatment with colony-stimulating factors. At the tolerated schedules of dose levels ≥ 0.4 mg, CC-99282 monotherapy demonstrated an overall response rate of 40% (10/25 pts with objective responses including 3 FL, 1 FL grade IIIB, and 6 DLBCL), including complete responses in 3 pts and partial responses in 7 pts. Responses appeared durable with an observed range of 9-407 days, as of the cutoff date. Objective responses were observed in patients treated with prior CAR T or lenalidomide. Selection of the RP2D is pending and updated data for optimal dose regimen will be presented at ASH 2021. Interim PK analysis showed that CC-99282 was absorbed rapidly with a prolonged terminal half-life (median of ~ 50 hours at doses ≥ 0.4 mg) and excellent distribution into the peripheral compartment. Increase in plasma CC-99282 and degradation of Ikaros/Aiolos in peripheral T cells occurred in a dose-dependent manner where maximum degradation (> 90%) occurred by day 4 of treatment at doses ≥ 0.4 mg. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed immunostimulatory activity with increases in both T cell and natural killer cell compartments. The circulating tumor DNA analysis showed a reduction in the single nucleotide variants of tumor DNA as early as cycle 1 day 15 that correlated with response to CC-99282 treatment and suggested fast tumor cell-intrinsic activity. CC-99282 monotherapy showed a predictable and manageable safety profile and demonstrated promising efficacy in heavily pretreated pts with R/R NHL with PK/PD data consistent with robust CC-99282-mediated antitumor activity. This study is ongoing and actively enrolling additional cohorts. Disclosures Michot: ASTEX: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Aduro: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Argen-x: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Blueprint: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Boeringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo,: Research Funding; Debiopharm: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Eos: Research Funding; Exelixis: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Gamamabs: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; H3 biomedecine: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Chavez: MorphoSys: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy. Carpio: Regeneron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Travels and accommodations . Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Morillo: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Kuruvilla: Incyte: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Medison Ventures: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Antengene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Pinto: Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb-CELGENE: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Ribrag: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bachy: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Daiishi: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy. Buchholz: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Carrancio: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Guarinos: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Wu: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Patah: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pourdehnad: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: No royalty. Nastoupil: Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Denovo Pharma: Other: DSMC; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: DSMC, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,513
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetProtein Degradation and InhibitorsTravaux en français237 207