MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3216933975 · doi:10.7939/r3-vezg-j078

Optimal Real-Time Battery Scheduling with Reinforcement Learning and Neural Networks

2021· article· en· W3216933975 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolina Quiroz Juarez

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReinforcement learningComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Artificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceReinforcementEngineeringOperations management

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Climate change concerns have raised awareness about the importance of decarbonizing the power sector. In achieving such a goal, energy storage is a critical operation that is currently done using mostly fossil fuels as chemical energy storage. The only viable alternative is battery energy storage systems (BESS) given their portability, scalability and ease to install when compared with other storage technologies. BESS have been an important subject of research for decades. However, their massification has not been fully realized due to their costs and operational complexities. The battery scheduling problem has been extensively analyzed and a great variety of algorithms have been proposed as a solution. Nevertheless, considering that BESS operation is highly dependant on electrolyte chemistry, not all scheduling and control algorithms are useful for every real-time condition and every battery. Moreover, sophisticated high performing BESS control algorithms demand high computational resources that prevent them from being implemented in distributed energy systems. For instance, behind-the-meter (BTM) applications for residential buildings require real-time BESS control with high time resolution data. In this work, we propose a real-time BESS control method based on reinforcement learning and neural networks aimed at working with reduced computational resources and independently from the battery chemistry, which is then amenable to embedded systems applications. On the one hand, neural network (NN) algorithms popularity stems from their capability to solve high dimensional complex problems with minimal computational resources once the model has been trained. On the other hand, the NN training process requires high amounts of good quality labeled data. During this project, we used 1-min resolution datasets containing photovoltaic (PV) generation, residential demand, and price signals. Notwithstanding, the datasets used did not contain BESS charge and discharge information. We, however, generated charge and discharge data with a reinforcement learning (RL)-based Q-learning algorithm that took into account the system characteristics of a real vanadium redox flow battery experimental setup as well as the technical features of a lithium-ion battery available in the market. The RL-agent training process made use of large amounts of data and takes considerable processing time to obtain an optimal policy for a daily operational period. Therefore, the RL-agent’s main function is to generate labels to train different NN models, but not to be deployed on a real-time controller. The RL reward function privileged charge and discharge sequences that minimize final user costs compared to a PV system with no BESS. A positive reward was awarded every time the total electricity cost of a PV system was higher than the cost obtained with a PV-BESS system. All electricity costs were finally compared with the baseline PV system. However, the battery-agent was not always able to decrease electricity costs below the baseline as its performance is dependant on battery size and efficiency. In turn, the scheduling labels resulting from the RL-agent operation allowed us to train our NN models with accuracy such that we were able to abate PV system electricity costs. Finally, an application of our workflow to the BTM problem is explored, by comparing electricity costs calculated with both, Q-learning and NN algorithms, to a residential flat tariff offered by a local electricity provider in Edmonton. Our simulation suggests that in the current scenario, it is still not economically viable to adopt BESS technologies at a large scale in Alberta, Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,180
Écart entre enseignants0,175 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchTravaux en français237 207