MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216933975 · doi:10.7939/r3-vezg-j078

Optimal Real-Time Battery Scheduling with Reinforcement Learning and Neural Networks

2021· article· en· W3216933975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolina Quiroz Juarez

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Artificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceReinforcementEngineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change concerns have raised awareness about the importance of decarbonizing the power sector. In achieving such a goal, energy storage is a critical operation that is currently done using mostly fossil fuels as chemical energy storage. The only viable alternative is battery energy storage systems (BESS) given their portability, scalability and ease to install when compared with other storage technologies. BESS have been an important subject of research for decades. However, their massification has not been fully realized due to their costs and operational complexities. The battery scheduling problem has been extensively analyzed and a great variety of algorithms have been proposed as a solution. Nevertheless, considering that BESS operation is highly dependant on electrolyte chemistry, not all scheduling and control algorithms are useful for every real-time condition and every battery. Moreover, sophisticated high performing BESS control algorithms demand high computational resources that prevent them from being implemented in distributed energy systems. For instance, behind-the-meter (BTM) applications for residential buildings require real-time BESS control with high time resolution data. In this work, we propose a real-time BESS control method based on reinforcement learning and neural networks aimed at working with reduced computational resources and independently from the battery chemistry, which is then amenable to embedded systems applications. On the one hand, neural network (NN) algorithms popularity stems from their capability to solve high dimensional complex problems with minimal computational resources once the model has been trained. On the other hand, the NN training process requires high amounts of good quality labeled data. During this project, we used 1-min resolution datasets containing photovoltaic (PV) generation, residential demand, and price signals. Notwithstanding, the datasets used did not contain BESS charge and discharge information. We, however, generated charge and discharge data with a reinforcement learning (RL)-based Q-learning algorithm that took into account the system characteristics of a real vanadium redox flow battery experimental setup as well as the technical features of a lithium-ion battery available in the market. The RL-agent training process made use of large amounts of data and takes considerable processing time to obtain an optimal policy for a daily operational period. Therefore, the RL-agent’s main function is to generate labels to train different NN models, but not to be deployed on a real-time controller. The RL reward function privileged charge and discharge sequences that minimize final user costs compared to a PV system with no BESS. A positive reward was awarded every time the total electricity cost of a PV system was higher than the cost obtained with a PV-BESS system. All electricity costs were finally compared with the baseline PV system. However, the battery-agent was not always able to decrease electricity costs below the baseline as its performance is dependant on battery size and efficiency. In turn, the scheduling labels resulting from the RL-agent operation allowed us to train our NN models with accuracy such that we were able to abate PV system electricity costs. Finally, an application of our workflow to the BTM problem is explored, by comparing electricity costs calculated with both, Q-learning and NN algorithms, to a residential flat tariff offered by a local electricity provider in Edmonton. Our simulation suggests that in the current scenario, it is still not economically viable to adopt BESS technologies at a large scale in Alberta, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207