How Should Pathology Findings Influence Treatment in IgA Nephropathy?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
See Clinical Research on Page 99 See Clinical Research on Page 99 The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy is widely adopted, and numerous studies have addressed its value. Although most publications have found associations between each of the MEST-C lesions with progressive disease, only the tubulointerstitial score has consistently and independently predicted kidney outcomes.1Trimarchi H. Barratt J. Cattran D.C. et al.Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group.Kidney Int. 2017; 91: 1014-1021https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2017.02.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (394) Google Scholar Many studies report an immunosuppression bias, with some finding that glucocorticoids modify the predictive values of the E, S, and C lesions. A prespecified analysis in the TESTING trial addressed the effect of methylprednisolone in E0 compared with E1 but failed to reveal a significant interaction, although the analysis was underpowered given the premature data review mandated by safety concerns related to corticosteroid dose.2Lv J. Zhang H. Wong M.G. et al.Effect of oral methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2017; 318: 432-442https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.9362Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar Similarly, a post hoc review of the STOP-IgA study did not find an impact of pathology on the response to immunosuppression, but again too few events had occurred and less than half of the subjects had available pathology slides for Oxford scoring.3Schimpf J.I. Klein T. Fitzner C. et al.Renal outcomes of STOP-IgAN trial patients in relation to baseline histology (MEST-C scores).BMC Nephrol. 2018; 19: 328Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Given inconsistencies from retrospective studies and the absence of confirmatory findings from prospective trials, the recent 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Glomerular Disease Guidelines state “that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of the Oxford classification in determining when any glucocorticoid therapy should be commenced.”4Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work GroupKDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases.Kidney Int. 2021; 100: S1-S276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar Ideally, answering how biopsy findings should influence treatments would require a randomized controlled trial with a prespecified pathology-related hypothesis. Pragmatically, defining such as question is difficult because many permutations of the MEST-C score exist, and performing a separate study in each state would be impossible. Furthermore, the time from the kidney biopsy to randomization would need to be short, which has not been the case in previous trials largely related to barriers to recruitment (Table 1). Hence, we still rely on large observational cohorts to suggest how pathology and immunosuppression should be addressed using a simple experimental design.Table 1Pathology findings of STOP-IgA, TESTING, and a 2009 publication from Lv et al.6Lv J. Zhang H. Chen Y. et al.Combination therapy of prednisone and ACE inhibitor versus ACE-inhibitor therapy alone in patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: 26-32https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.029Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (150) Google ScholarStudy %M1E1S1T1–2C1–2Median time biopsy to randomizationLv et al., 2009aSupplementary data provided by Prof. Hong Zhang of the Peking Institute of Nephrology.7755733057Unknown. All biopsies within 1 yrTESTING, 20175828706155139 d (IQR: 107–244)STOP-IgA, 201526179141319.4 mo, 6% of biopsies >3 yrsIQR, interquartile range.a Supplementary data provided by Prof. Hong Zhang of the Peking Institute of Nephrology. Open table in a new tab IQR, interquartile range. Itami et al.5Itami S. Morimaya T. Miyabe Y. et al.A novel scoring system based on Oxford classification indicating steroid therapy use for IgA nephropathy.Kidney Int Rep. 2022; 7: 99-107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.007Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar endeavored to answer this question by studying a retrospective cohort of 858 patients from Japan. The authors first performed propensity-adjusted analyses within each possible score of the MEST-C classification and found that glucocorticoids were significantly associated with a reduced risk of end-stage kidney disease only in the presence of M1, E1, S1, or C1–2 lesions. Unlike previous studies considering only the binary presence or absence of lesions, the number of lesions was summed to create a “steroid responder score” of 0 to 4. They also determined that the presence of T1–2 was associated with a lack of response to glucocorticoids, as opposed to T0 and similarly defined the T lesion as the “steroid non-responder score.” They then reanalyzed the benefits of glucocorticoid therapy according to 6 possible permutations defined by low (0), medium (1–2), or high (3–4) active lesions, each with or without significant interstitial tubular atrophy of interstitial fibrosis. In those with a “low” active lesion score, few progressed to end-stage kidney disease regardless of the T status, supporting conservative management only. Those with 1–2/4 active lesions and significant tubulointerstitial scarring had no benefits using corticosteroids with hazard ratios ∼1.0 using different models. By contrast, the use of glucocorticoids was associated with a reduced hazard (0.3–0.5) of end-stage kidney disease in individuals with high activity and T1–2 or those with medium activity and T0. Finally, those with high activity and little chronicity experienced a remarkable reduction in the risk of end-stage kidney disease using immunosuppression. Validation of their findings could easily be attempted using large existing databases, perhaps excluding those with a significant time lag between the kidney biopsy and the initiation of immunosuppression. Taken together, the conclusions from the Japanese cohort suggest that the prespecified question to test is whether glucocorticoids are effective when the kidney biopsy results reveal either high activity as defined previously or medium activity combined with little tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis. The 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines also caution against use of immunosuppression when the estimated glomerular filtration rate is <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the absence of a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Could these results also explain divergences between conclusions from STOP-IgA and other randomized trials? The MEST-C scores are available for STOP-IgA,3Schimpf J.I. Klein T. Fitzner C. et al.Renal outcomes of STOP-IgAN trial patients in relation to baseline histology (MEST-C scores).BMC Nephrol. 2018; 19: 328Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar TESTING,2Lv J. Zhang H. Wong M.G. et al.Effect of oral methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2017; 318: 432-442https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.9362Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar and a 2009 publication from Lv et al.6Lv J. Zhang H. Chen Y. et al.Combination therapy of prednisone and ACE inhibitor versus ACE-inhibitor therapy alone in patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: 26-32https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.029Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar All 3 controlled studies had optimal conservative treatment, and the pathology findings are found in Table 1. Although we cannot derive the exact activity scores from the reported percentages of each MEST-C lesion, they seem lower in STOP-IgA, which could partly explain the lack of benefits from immunosuppression in that cohort. It is also possible that these lesions had significantly changed from biopsy to randomization with greater chronic and fewer active lesions. The proposed distinction between active and chronic lesions is not new and has long been used in lupus nephritis. The 2018 revision of the Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis clarified and modified the activity and chronicity scores.7Bajema I.M. Wilhelmus S. Alpers C.E. et al.Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices.Kidney Int. 2018; 93: 789-796https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2017.11.023Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (191) Google Scholar Notably, segmental glomerulosclerosis is included in the chronicity index for lupus nephritis given its association with renal failure,8Austin 3rd, H.A. Muenz L.R. Joyce K.M. et al.Diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: identification of specific pathologic features affecting renal outcome.Kidney Int. 1984; 25: 689-695https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1984.75Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (566) Google Scholar whereas in the Itami study in IgA nephropathy, it may indicate responsiveness to immunosuppression. At face value, this may suggest that segmental glomerulosclerosis has different implications in different diseases. Nevertheless, it is possible that this reflects the spectrum of lesions that may be interpreted as segmental sclerosis. As much as focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis encompasses different diseases, the Oxford S score incorporates multiple lesions. An analysis of a subset of the original Oxford cohort detailed these, including hyalinosis, segmental sclerosis, adhesions, podocyte hypertrophy, and tip lesions.9Bellur S.S. Lepeytre F. Vorobyeva O. et al.Evidence from the Oxford Classification cohort supports the clinical value of subclassification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in IgA nephropathy.Kidney Int. 2017; 91: 235-243https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.09.029Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar The presence of podocyte hypertrophy or tip lesions was associated with much higher proteinuria and linked to a worse prognosis without immunosuppressive treatment but a favorable one when treated, supporting the designation of these as active lesions. Furthermore, segmental sclerosis or hyalinosis without adhesions or podocytopathic features was not associated with proteinuria and seemed to reflect chronicity.9Bellur S.S. Lepeytre F. Vorobyeva O. et al.Evidence from the Oxford Classification cohort supports the clinical value of subclassification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in IgA nephropathy.Kidney Int. 2017; 91: 235-243https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.09.029Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar Hence, a refinement of the S score may be necessary. There are additional hurdles to address with the MEST-C classification. The most important relates to its reproducibility. An analysis of the European VALIGA cohort identified marked differences between local and central (Oxford) assessments of the MEST-C score.10Bellur S.S. Roberts I.S.D. Troyanov S. et al.Reproducibility of the Oxford classification of immunoglobulin A nephropathy, impact of biopsy scoring on treatment allocation and clinical relevance of disagreements: evidence from the VALidation of IGA study cohort [published correction appears in Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35:1453].Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019; 34: 1681-1690https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy337Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar These disagreements were not random. Mismatches in the M and E scores carried different associations with progression when only local pathologists found the lesions instead of vice versa. Although reproducibility may be disappointing, the Oxford classification methodology has allowed to characterize the problem, offering the possibility to correct assessments and standardize reporting. This enables stakeholders to speak the same language and promote uniform research and clinical approaches. Despite the ongoing uncertainty on how pathology should influence treatment, it is precisely the same M, E, S, and C scores identified by the Itami study that were independently associated with the decision to administer glucocorticoids in the VALIGA cohort, along with age and proteinuria.10Bellur S.S. Roberts I.S.D. Troyanov S. et al.Reproducibility of the Oxford classification of immunoglobulin A nephropathy, impact of biopsy scoring on treatment allocation and clinical relevance of disagreements: evidence from the VALidation of IGA study cohort [published correction appears in Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35:1453].Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019; 34: 1681-1690https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy337Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar These lesions had a greater impact on treatment allocation than the estimated glomerular filtration rate or tubulointerstitial lesions suggesting European nephrologists considered activity and chronicity in IgA nephropathy akin to lupus nephritis long before the recent Japanese publication. Pathology findings holds great predictive value compared with a single cross-sectional clinical assessment (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood pressure), but repeated clinical assessments eventually outweigh the findings of a single biopsy.11Barbour S.J. Espino-Hernandez G. Reich H.N. et al.The MEST score provides earlier risk prediction in lgA nephropathy.Kidney Int. 2016; 89: 167-175https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2015.322Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (124) Google Scholar If the conclusions from the Japanese cohort are validated, this would strongly support the inclusion of a simple prespecified pathology-defined hypothesis in future trials. It would also encourage repeating renal biopsies in individuals who deteriorate long after their initial biopsy, personalizing the allocation of potentially hazardous treatments, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. HR has received consulting fees or honoraria for lectures form Calliditas, Novartis, Chinook, Travere, and Omeros. MH has received grants or consulting fees from Calliditas, Pfizer, Ionis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, and Alnylam. ST declared no competing interests. A Novel Scoring System Based on Oxford Classification Indicating Steroid Therapy Use for IgA NephropathyKidney International ReportsVol. 7Issue 1PreviewThe usefulness of the Oxford classification (MEST-C score) for deciding the management approach for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains unclear. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».