MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217037934 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.11.001

How Should Pathology Findings Influence Treatment in IgA Nephropathy?

2021· editorial· en· W3217037934 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphan Troyanov, Michelle Hladunewich, Heather N. Reich

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNephropathyImmunosuppressionClinical trialRandomized controlled trialPost-hoc analysisInternal medicineMethylprednisoloneScopusMEDLINEPathologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy is widely adopted, and numerous studies have addressed its value. Although most publications have found associations between each of the MEST-C lesions with progressive disease, only the tubulointerstitial score has consistently and independently predicted kidney outcomes.1 Many studies report an immunosuppression bias, with some finding that glucocorticoids modify the predictive values of the E, S, and C lesions. A prespecified analysis in the TESTING trial addressed the effect of methylprednisolone in E0 compared with E1 but failed to reveal a significant interaction, although the analysis was underpowered given the premature data review mandated by safety concerns related to corticosteroid dose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.298
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.298
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207