MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3217783018 · doi:10.1353/mhr.2021.0024

The Shattered Cross: French Catholic Missionaries on the Mississippi River, 1698-1725 by Linda Carol Jones

2021· article· en· W3217783018 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth C. Carstens

Notice bibliographique

RevueMichigan Historical Review · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPeninsulaHistoryColonialismArt historyClassicsArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Shattered Cross: French Catholic Missionaries on the Mississippi River, 1698-1725 by Linda Carol Jones Kenneth C. Carstens Linda Carol Jones. The Shattered Cross: French Catholic Missionaries on the Mississippi River, 1698-1725. Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 2020. Pp. 297. Figures. Index. Maps. Notes. Cloth: $50.00. I have been fascinated by early (colonial) New World Catholic missionaries since 1959, when my parents first took me to Fort Michilimackinac at the tip of Michigan's Lower Peninsula, then farther north to St. Ignace and Sault Ste. Marie, both in the Upper Peninsula. There, I learned firsthand about the work of the early Jesuit fathers, and their attempts (some successful, some not) to bring Native Americans to Christianity. By the mid-1960s, I had read Vernon Kinietz's book Indian Life in the Upper Great Lakes, 1615-1760 (1965), which further fostered my interest about the assimilation and acculturation process behind culture change. As a budding anthropologist, I read Reuben Thwaites's seventy-three-volume work Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, 1610-1791 (1853-1915) through my college years at Central Michigan University. Now, added to these noted works, is a new book written by Linda Carol Jones. Jones, an associate professor of language area studies at the University of Arkansas, has further documented the influence of Jesuits from the Great Lakes area into the middle and lower Mississippi River valley. After reading Jones's work, I am confident her book will be considered of equal importance to the writings of Kinietz and Thwaites whenever studies about early colonial Jesuit history of the pays d'en haut are mentioned. Jones details the extraordinary, often reciprocal, and dynamic interactions (both good and bad) among different Native and European groups along the Mississippi River during the colonial (contact period) era. These dynamic cultural interactions might be Natives (various Illini groups and groups located further south along the Mississippi, like the Tamarois, Quapaw, Chickasaw, Natchez, or others) with other Natives; Natives and Europeans—the world of European traders (both French and English), coureurs de bois, and metis—and Europeans with other Europeans (e.g., Jesuits with various political leaders such as Cadillac, Iberville, or Bienville), explorers (e.g., LaSalle and Tonti), religious leaders (whether back in Montreal with the Petit Séminaire de Québec, in Paris, or with the Holy See at the Vatican), or different missionary sects also vying for Native converts to baptize. Indeed, Jones's book details the significant, and extremely complex, ideological and political considerations Jesuit fathers needed to "stay alive" (although martyrdom was not a bad thing if done for the right reasons), and how best to convert Natives to Christianity: force-feeding Christianity and European values to Native Americans in what Jones calls "Frenchification" (that is, forcefully [End Page 151] making Natives French men and women), or finding ways (linguistically or culturally) that Native Americans themselves selected to adopt; that is, letting the choice of acceptance or rejection be a Native one, whether for what the idea was, or a modification of the idea as it would best fit a Native cultural need or understanding. Indeed, when Frenchification was forced on Natives, the results ended in a "shattered cross." Although I considered my background in Jesuit history in North America better than average, I learned so much more about Colonial Jesuit history that I did not know previously, especially regarding the political climate between Jesuits and church leadership (that is, "Jesuits in the field" versus church leadership in Montreal, Paris, or the Vatican). Nor was I aware that the idea to begin missionary work among Native Americans along the Mississippi River had its origin in seventeenth-century Jesuit fathers in China. And although church philosophy in the late 1600s and early 1700s was to force "Frenchification" on the Natives, Jesuits who were the most successful as Christian missionaries were those who practiced love, allowing Natives to accept or reject on their own terms what part of French culture and Catholicism best served their needs. Colonialism, including intentional forms of assimilation, acculturation, and—yes—genocide, is not to be condoned in today's world. But it did happen. Ignoring that it happened presents an incomplete...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,167
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMichigan Historical ReviewMême sujetArchaeology and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207