MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W322704269

On the Return of (the Repressed): Rhetoric

2001· article· en· W322704269 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erika Dyck

Notice bibliographique

RevueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueRhetoric and Communication Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRhetoricMetaphorLiteratureClichéExaggerationFreudian slipPhilosophyPsychoanalysisAestheticsPsychologyArtLinguistics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Using a Freudian metaphor reinterpreted by Jacques Lacan, this essay argues that rhetoric is returning to humanities. That return manifests itself in partial returns through topoi, truncated returns via figure, fuller returns in feminist criticism, and in varying degrees of success, but always with playful seriousness that is rhetoric's trademark. It is always heartwarming to see a cliche return to fresh usage, as return it apparently must. Perhaps Freud was right after all--perhaps the return of is inevitable; or, in Lacan's terms, perhaps very mechanism of language, sign, itself split into a signifier and a signified, is locus of a primal repression that subject enters into and engages willy-nilly every time he or she speaks. any case, I was delighted several years ago to witness return of cool to contemporary slanguage. Everybody, it seemed, was using word as an endorsement of nearly highest sort. Even English professors, some of them old enough to have repressed knowledge that cool had been a bon mot during their adolescent years, were part of this return. My students were stunned, however, when I refused to allow it as a critical term in textual analysis. But I stood firm, thinking that if I allowed cool then I would have to allow also hot, somewhat less positive, and somewhat more posit ive. Thus, or so they told me, Coleridge would be wicked, Wordsworth cool, and Blake merely hot. Despite buzz at my workplace about learning paradigm, I did not think that a metaphor from hell was a useful instrument of analysis. Rhetoric, too, has (nearly) returned from being repressed. It has, of course, its specialist journals--the somewhat conservative Rhetorica and contemporary Pre/Text, but return is wider and deeper than that, wider and deeper than even flourishing departments of communication and composition in chiefly United States colleges and universities. Literary Review of Canada's The Globe and Mail, for example, has for several years run subheading Reading, Writing, and Rhetoric. a recent issue, cultural critic Robert Enright writes of the photograph as not mentioning Doris Lessing's comment that visual arts are spatial, not temporal, and not mentioning, either, rhetoric's much older figure, ecphrasis, a temporal account, often a narrative, of a visual work of art. Keats's Ode on a Grecian Urn, with its ironically excessive praise of still life pictured on urn leading to aporia (another rhetorical figure) of a devastating judgement in poem's closing lines ( Cold Pastoral!), is a well-known example of latter. With popular press and academic journal, in other words, we have come a long way from time when rhetoric meant simply failed or bad rhetoric, at best bombast, at worst falsehood. We may not fully recover term before it slides into disuse once more, of course, but no matter; it's principle of return that is my focus here. For that return is itself a figure of language writ large and is called by a dizzying number of names--anaphora, epanalepsis, ploce-- all of them variations on idea of repetition. Heraklitis remarked long ago that one cannot step in same river twice, and in that sense repetition is never simple, always complex. In my end [beginning] is my beginning [end] , says poet T.S. Eliot, and so it is with cool and rhetoric. Both Kerouac and Aristotle would be pleased, I think, with this (re)turn of events. Rhetoric as term and theory is still repressed in much contemporary criticism (also, but misleadingly, called theory), although rhetoric itself is very much present in that criticism's reliance on trope and figure. Thus, deconstruction endlessly discovers aporia (J. Hillis Miller), psychoanalytic criticism recovers ethos of subject (Jacques Lacan), reader-response theory pathos of audience (Stanley Fish), new historicism studies relations among ethos, pathos, and logos (Michel Foucault), and so on. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,718
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMosaic (Winnipeg)Même sujetRhetoric and Communication StudiesTravaux en français237 207