MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W322704269

On the Return of (the Repressed): Rhetoric

2001· article· en· W322704269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erika Dyck

Bibliographic record

VenueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetoricMetaphorLiteratureClichéExaggerationFreudian slipPhilosophyPsychoanalysisAestheticsPsychologyArtLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a Freudian metaphor reinterpreted by Jacques Lacan, this essay argues that rhetoric is returning to humanities. That return manifests itself in partial returns through topoi, truncated returns via figure, fuller returns in feminist criticism, and in varying degrees of success, but always with playful seriousness that is rhetoric's trademark. It is always heartwarming to see a cliche return to fresh usage, as return it apparently must. Perhaps Freud was right after all--perhaps the return of is inevitable; or, in Lacan's terms, perhaps very mechanism of language, sign, itself split into a signifier and a signified, is locus of a primal repression that subject enters into and engages willy-nilly every time he or she speaks. any case, I was delighted several years ago to witness return of cool to contemporary slanguage. Everybody, it seemed, was using word as an endorsement of nearly highest sort. Even English professors, some of them old enough to have repressed knowledge that cool had been a bon mot during their adolescent years, were part of this return. My students were stunned, however, when I refused to allow it as a critical term in textual analysis. But I stood firm, thinking that if I allowed cool then I would have to allow also hot, somewhat less positive, and somewhat more posit ive. Thus, or so they told me, Coleridge would be wicked, Wordsworth cool, and Blake merely hot. Despite buzz at my workplace about learning paradigm, I did not think that a metaphor from hell was a useful instrument of analysis. Rhetoric, too, has (nearly) returned from being repressed. It has, of course, its specialist journals--the somewhat conservative Rhetorica and contemporary Pre/Text, but return is wider and deeper than that, wider and deeper than even flourishing departments of communication and composition in chiefly United States colleges and universities. Literary Review of Canada's The Globe and Mail, for example, has for several years run subheading Reading, Writing, and Rhetoric. a recent issue, cultural critic Robert Enright writes of the photograph as not mentioning Doris Lessing's comment that visual arts are spatial, not temporal, and not mentioning, either, rhetoric's much older figure, ecphrasis, a temporal account, often a narrative, of a visual work of art. Keats's Ode on a Grecian Urn, with its ironically excessive praise of still life pictured on urn leading to aporia (another rhetorical figure) of a devastating judgement in poem's closing lines ( Cold Pastoral!), is a well-known example of latter. With popular press and academic journal, in other words, we have come a long way from time when rhetoric meant simply failed or bad rhetoric, at best bombast, at worst falsehood. We may not fully recover term before it slides into disuse once more, of course, but no matter; it's principle of return that is my focus here. For that return is itself a figure of language writ large and is called by a dizzying number of names--anaphora, epanalepsis, ploce-- all of them variations on idea of repetition. Heraklitis remarked long ago that one cannot step in same river twice, and in that sense repetition is never simple, always complex. In my end [beginning] is my beginning [end] , says poet T.S. Eliot, and so it is with cool and rhetoric. Both Kerouac and Aristotle would be pleased, I think, with this (re)turn of events. Rhetoric as term and theory is still repressed in much contemporary criticism (also, but misleadingly, called theory), although rhetoric itself is very much present in that criticism's reliance on trope and figure. Thus, deconstruction endlessly discovers aporia (J. Hillis Miller), psychoanalytic criticism recovers ethos of subject (Jacques Lacan), reader-response theory pathos of audience (Stanley Fish), new historicism studies relations among ethos, pathos, and logos (Michel Foucault), and so on. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMosaic (Winnipeg)Same topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207