MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W330131873

Guest Editorial: A Tribute to Dr. Mahmoud Gudarzi

2005· editorial· en· W330131873 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faustine C. Jones‐Wilson

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Negro Education · 2005
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRace, History, and American Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTributeCertificateCertificationPoliticsPolitical scienceMedical educationSociologyLibrary scienceManagementMedia studiesPsychologyLawMedicineMathematicsComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

For approximately eighteen years, 1986-2004, the late Dr. Mahmoud Gudarzi was a valuable staff member with The Journal of Negro Education, serving in dual capacities as Circulation Manager and Editorial Assistant. His able work far exceeded the job descriptions and expectations of these roles. Indeed, he became indispensable to the effective functioning of this periodical, and his dedication will be sorely missed. He was quite underemployed at The Journal, but he never once complained about his situation. Let me talk about him and his circumstances. I had met Mr. Gudarzi earlier in the School of Education at Howard University. He was enrolled for a major in Educational Technology in the Certificate of Advanced Graduate Study program, commonly known as the Advanced Certificate program, which provided graduate study and certification a year beyond (above) the Master's degree. I taught one of the required courses in this program, and Mr. Gudarzi enrolled in that class. I was struck by his wisdom and insights. Clearly, he was a bit older than the typical student enrolled in this program, and obviously from another country. It was my custom to chat with my students during office hours, and I inquired of him about his background. I learned that he was a native of Iran, and that he had graduated from high school there. He had earned his Master's and Ph.D. degrees in Journalism in Germany. Although he never said so directly, I assumed that he had come to the United States as a kind of political refugee-seeking the freedom to write and speak freely without fear of retaliation. I never pried into people's personal lives, so I did not ask him directly how he came to migrate to the United States. After Dr. Gudarzi completed the Advanced Certificate program in Educational Technology, he experienced great difficulty in locating employment. Relations between our country and Iran were tenuous, and I always felt that his Iranian background was a factor in his unemployment. In 1986, the female incumbent of the Circulation Manager/Editorial Assistant position with The Journal decided to take advantage of an early retirement program offered by the University, which then resulted in a staff vacancy. I called Dr. Gudarzi, and explained that this staff vacancy existed, that it was quite below his level of qualifications, and that he would have to compete with qualified others for the job. He did apply for the position, and his credentials were far superior to those of his competitors. I employed him, and he remained with The Journal until his 2004 retirement that was caused by his ill health. As I worked with Dr. Gudarzi, I learned more about him. He spoke Farsi fluently, and wrote elegantly in that language. He also spoke and wrote in German, French, and English. So much of his writing centered on politics and on social justice, particularly for women. For at least fifteen years he wrote a weekly editorial in the Canadian journal, Shahrvand, which is also distributed in Texas, Australia, Africa, and Germany. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Negro EducationMême sujetRace, History, and American SocietyTravaux en français237 207