MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W331820171

Heart & Soul: Bringing a global vision to medical school

2002· article· en· W331820171 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Heather Kent

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnthusiasmPassionContext (archaeology)Face (sociological concept)Government (linguistics)SoulMedicineGlobal healthHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)SociologyFamily medicinePsychologyHistoryPublic healthNursingSocial science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Medical students bring many things back to Canada after travelling abroad. Daniel Roth brought an enthusiasm for global health issues that he felt driven to share with his fellow students at the University of British Columbia (UBC), and the result was a student-run conference on global health ethics ( www.med.ubc.ca/ethicsworkshop) that attracted nearly 20 presenters, including experts from South Africa, Peru, Bosnia and Cameroon. Roth, now a pediatrics resident in Edmonton, says UBC's medical school offers little teaching on international issues. Most of the 20 students who organized the conference, Toward Equality in Global Health: Do Ethics Matter?, and the 75 who attended were exploring the field for the first time. Roth says their “passion showed me [they] have been really eager to have the opportunity to talk about this. People left thinking, ‘wow, this is really important.’ ” It was already important to Roth. During an elective in South Africa, he came face to face with the impact AIDS is having in countries not equipped to deal with it. In Hlabisa, a city of 200 000 near Durban, most patients with tuberculosis or AIDS see traditional healers before coming to the hospital in the final stages of disease. “The overwhelming preponderance of disease related to being ravaged by HIV,” he says. “When you are there you not only see the burden of illness but also the context.” About 30% of people in the Hlabisa region are infected with HIV. During his stay, the South African government abruptly altered its AIDS policies, allowing nursing mothers with HIV/AIDS to take antiretroviral drugs to prevent transmission to their babies. However, he says there will still be no infrastructure available to deal with the generation of orphans AIDS is producing. Roth's interest in global health dates to the year he spent in the shantytowns of Lima and in rural Peru after his second year in medical school. His motivation came from his dual interests in research and international health. His Peruvian projects included studies of the informed-consent process and of vitamin D deficiency in adults with TB. He found that informed consent inevitably led to a clash of cultural values that was compounded by bureaucracy and by concepts that do not translate well into Spanish. He said Peruvians found it hard to comprehend that they had to be asked permission to let doctors perform a procedure that they had already been assured would do them no harm. Roth's passionate interest in international health also led him to pen the winning entry in the student/resident category of CMAJ's annual essay contest, “Humanitarian aid and medical research: an illusion of dichotomy in international health” (CMAJ 2000;164 [13]: 1862-3). Roth would like UBC to spend more time teaching medical students about global health issues; a section on global ethics has recently been added to a health care ethics course. “When students learn about HIV, it should be emphasized that this is a global problem,” he says. “I think every medical student should have some understanding of these issues.” Roth says his experience in Peru helped him to choose his specialty because it “gave me some sense of direction.” He is still involved with Peruvian research projects and may spend more time in South America during his residency. — Heather Kent, Vancouver

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,196

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,014
Communication savante0,0190,017
Science ouverte0,0020,024
Intégrité de la recherche0,0170,034
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0590,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,350 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Même sujetChild and Adolescent Health→Travaux en français237 207→