MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W331820171

Heart & Soul: Bringing a global vision to medical school

2002· article· en· W331820171 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Heather Kent

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmPassionContext (archaeology)Face (sociological concept)Government (linguistics)SoulMedicineGlobal healthHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)SociologyFamily medicinePsychologyHistoryPublic healthNursingSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical students bring many things back to Canada after travelling abroad. Daniel Roth brought an enthusiasm for global health issues that he felt driven to share with his fellow students at the University of British Columbia (UBC), and the result was a student-run conference on global health ethics ( www.med.ubc.ca/ethicsworkshop) that attracted nearly 20 presenters, including experts from South Africa, Peru, Bosnia and Cameroon. Roth, now a pediatrics resident in Edmonton, says UBC's medical school offers little teaching on international issues. Most of the 20 students who organized the conference, Toward Equality in Global Health: Do Ethics Matter?, and the 75 who attended were exploring the field for the first time. Roth says their “passion showed me [they] have been really eager to have the opportunity to talk about this. People left thinking, ‘wow, this is really important.’ ” It was already important to Roth. During an elective in South Africa, he came face to face with the impact AIDS is having in countries not equipped to deal with it. In Hlabisa, a city of 200 000 near Durban, most patients with tuberculosis or AIDS see traditional healers before coming to the hospital in the final stages of disease. “The overwhelming preponderance of disease related to being ravaged by HIV,” he says. “When you are there you not only see the burden of illness but also the context.” About 30% of people in the Hlabisa region are infected with HIV. During his stay, the South African government abruptly altered its AIDS policies, allowing nursing mothers with HIV/AIDS to take antiretroviral drugs to prevent transmission to their babies. However, he says there will still be no infrastructure available to deal with the generation of orphans AIDS is producing. Roth's interest in global health dates to the year he spent in the shantytowns of Lima and in rural Peru after his second year in medical school. His motivation came from his dual interests in research and international health. His Peruvian projects included studies of the informed-consent process and of vitamin D deficiency in adults with TB. He found that informed consent inevitably led to a clash of cultural values that was compounded by bureaucracy and by concepts that do not translate well into Spanish. He said Peruvians found it hard to comprehend that they had to be asked permission to let doctors perform a procedure that they had already been assured would do them no harm. Roth's passionate interest in international health also led him to pen the winning entry in the student/resident category of CMAJ's annual essay contest, “Humanitarian aid and medical research: an illusion of dichotomy in international health” (CMAJ 2000;164 [13]: 1862-3). Roth would like UBC to spend more time teaching medical students about global health issues; a section on global ethics has recently been added to a health care ethics course. “When students learn about HIV, it should be emphasized that this is a global problem,” he says. “I think every medical student should have some understanding of these issues.” Roth says his experience in Peru helped him to choose his specialty because it “gave me some sense of direction.” He is still involved with Peruvian research projects and may spend more time in South America during his residency. — Heather Kent, Vancouver

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.014
Scholarly communication0.0190.017
Open science0.0020.024
Research integrity0.0170.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicChild and Adolescent Health→French-language works237,207→