Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT. A recent development in Chinese renders many occurrences of the construction [Adjunct PP + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] into [Verb + N2 + N[P.sub.1]]. A crucial difference between the two constructions is that in the former the verb and its N[P.sub.2] object can be separated. In the latter no separation is permitted, and N[P.sub.2] consists of only its head [N.sub.2]; that is, the verb and [N.sub.2], have formed a V-N COMPOUND. This paper attempts to account for such V-N compounding in Chinese. We suppose that the lexical structure representation of verbs in the Chinese V-N compound is similar to that of denominal verbs (Hale & Keyser 1993b). Thus, the formation of the Chinese V-N compound can be derived most simply by head movement, which is both morphologically driven and constrained by the Minimal Link Condition (Chomsky 1994). * INTRODUCTION. A recent development in Chinese renders many cases of [Adjunct PP (i.e. P + N[P.sub.1]) + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] into [Verb + [N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]], especially when the adjunct PP is locative (Hua 1997, Wang 1997, Xing 1997, Liu 1998a,b, Wang 1998), as shown by 1a-b, 2a-b and 3a-b. (1) (1) a. women xiang Niuyue qian ju we to New York move home [right arrow] b. women qian ju Niuyue (2) we move home New York 'We move to New York' (2) a. ta zai Hafu zhi jiao he at Harvard University engage teaching [right arrow] b. ta zhi jiao Hafu he engage teaching Harvard University He teaches at Harvard University' (3) a. Mali zai Jianada liu xue Mary in Canada engage study [right arrow] b. Mali liu xue Jianada Mary engage study Canada 'Mary studies in Canada' The crucial difference between the two constructions is that in [Adjunct PP + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] the verb and its N[P.sub.2] object can be separated by an aspect marker, a measure phrase, or a modifier of N[P.sub.2] (Li & Thompson 1981), as in 4a, 5a, and 6a. On the other hand, in [Verb + [N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]] no such separation is permitted, and N[P.sub.2] consists of its head noun [N.sub.2] only, as shown in 4b, 5b, and 6b. (4) a. women xiang Niuyue qian-le ju we to New York move-Asp home 'We have moved to New York' b. *women qian-le ju Niuyue we move-ASP home New York (5) a. ta zai Hafu zhi-le yi nian jiao he at Harvard University engage-ASP one year teaching 'He has taught at Harvard University for one year' b. *ta zhi-le yi nian jiao Hafu he engage-ASP one year teaching Harvard University (6) a. Mali zai Jianada liu-guo liang ci xue Mary in Canada engage-ASP two CL study 'Mary has studied in Canada twice' b. *Mali liu-guo liang ci xue Jianada Mary engage-ASP two CL study Canada In sum, the verb and [N.sub.2] in 1b, 2b, and 3b have formed a V-N COMPOUND. The V-N compound has, in fact, long existed in Chinese (Chao 1968), but until recently very few of them could take an NP object without being treated as ungrammatical or unacceptable (Li & Thompson 1981). By contrast, [[P + N[P.sub.1]] + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] has been regarded as the norm and has been strongly required or preferred (Hua 1997, Chow 2000). Since the 1970s, however, many cases of [[P + N[P.sub.1]] + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] have been transformed into [V-[N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]] (Xing 1997, Diao 1998). (3) Now the [V-[N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]] construction has become so common that it is no longer treated as ungrammatical or unacceptable but as a legitimate type of predicate structure (Gao 1998, Liu 1998a,b, Wang 1998). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».