Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. A recent development in Chinese renders many occurrences of the construction [Adjunct PP + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] into [Verb + N2 + N[P.sub.1]]. A crucial difference between the two constructions is that in the former the verb and its N[P.sub.2] object can be separated. In the latter no separation is permitted, and N[P.sub.2] consists of only its head [N.sub.2]; that is, the verb and [N.sub.2], have formed a V-N COMPOUND. This paper attempts to account for such V-N compounding in Chinese. We suppose that the lexical structure representation of verbs in the Chinese V-N compound is similar to that of denominal verbs (Hale & Keyser 1993b). Thus, the formation of the Chinese V-N compound can be derived most simply by head movement, which is both morphologically driven and constrained by the Minimal Link Condition (Chomsky 1994). * INTRODUCTION. A recent development in Chinese renders many cases of [Adjunct PP (i.e. P + N[P.sub.1]) + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] into [Verb + [N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]], especially when the adjunct PP is locative (Hua 1997, Wang 1997, Xing 1997, Liu 1998a,b, Wang 1998), as shown by 1a-b, 2a-b and 3a-b. (1) (1) a. women xiang Niuyue qian ju we to New York move home [right arrow] b. women qian ju Niuyue (2) we move home New York 'We move to New York' (2) a. ta zai Hafu zhi jiao he at Harvard University engage teaching [right arrow] b. ta zhi jiao Hafu he engage teaching Harvard University He teaches at Harvard University' (3) a. Mali zai Jianada liu xue Mary in Canada engage study [right arrow] b. Mali liu xue Jianada Mary engage study Canada 'Mary studies in Canada' The crucial difference between the two constructions is that in [Adjunct PP + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] the verb and its N[P.sub.2] object can be separated by an aspect marker, a measure phrase, or a modifier of N[P.sub.2] (Li & Thompson 1981), as in 4a, 5a, and 6a. On the other hand, in [Verb + [N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]] no such separation is permitted, and N[P.sub.2] consists of its head noun [N.sub.2] only, as shown in 4b, 5b, and 6b. (4) a. women xiang Niuyue qian-le ju we to New York move-Asp home 'We have moved to New York' b. *women qian-le ju Niuyue we move-ASP home New York (5) a. ta zai Hafu zhi-le yi nian jiao he at Harvard University engage-ASP one year teaching 'He has taught at Harvard University for one year' b. *ta zhi-le yi nian jiao Hafu he engage-ASP one year teaching Harvard University (6) a. Mali zai Jianada liu-guo liang ci xue Mary in Canada engage-ASP two CL study 'Mary has studied in Canada twice' b. *Mali liu-guo liang ci xue Jianada Mary engage-ASP two CL study Canada In sum, the verb and [N.sub.2] in 1b, 2b, and 3b have formed a V-N COMPOUND. The V-N compound has, in fact, long existed in Chinese (Chao 1968), but until recently very few of them could take an NP object without being treated as ungrammatical or unacceptable (Li & Thompson 1981). By contrast, [[P + N[P.sub.1]] + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] has been regarded as the norm and has been strongly required or preferred (Hua 1997, Chow 2000). Since the 1970s, however, many cases of [[P + N[P.sub.1]] + Verb + N[P.sub.2]] have been transformed into [V-[N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]] (Xing 1997, Diao 1998). (3) Now the [V-[N.sub.2] + N[P.sub.1]] construction has become so common that it is no longer treated as ungrammatical or unacceptable but as a legitimate type of predicate structure (Gao 1998, Liu 1998a,b, Wang 1998). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".