Advancing 21st-Century Child Welfare through Community Building
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We know that no one child- and family-serving system has the mandate, resources, or reach to address the personal issues or social and community conditions that are related to risk factors faced by families involved with child welfare systems. Hundreds of thousands of children and families are helped every day by the child welfare system and other child- and family-serving systems. Millions more, however, do not have access to available, appropriate, or equitable services and supports. For far too many children and families, the failure to meet these human needs and basic rights has significant consequences. This includes lives filled with pain, suffering, and quiet desperation. Even so, as the articles in this volume suggest, we are learning and succeeding. Community building is becoming an essential part of all child and family practice. When we who work in or influence these systems; fundamentally change our roles with one another; change our relationships with the children, youth, and families we serve; and actively engage community stakeholders, we provide more strategic supports and can collaboratively achieve more effective outcomes for this most vulnerable population. This is the work before us. Early social reformers and Progressive Era activists called for community improvements to advance child and family well-being. In fact, for more than a century, researchers have argued that vulnerable children can be most effectively served in the context of their families and communities. Although family-centered and family support movements have evolved, especially in the past two decades, few if any comparable undertakings have occurred in community building. The Child Welfare League of America's (CWLA) National Framework for Community Action represents one of the first organizing tools for community building to advance child welfare. Reframing the concerns of vulnerable children and families as community-building issues places new challenges before policymakers, administrators, front-line service providers, and academics. Those at the forefront who develop the tools, models, and conceptual frameworks for community building need an opportunity to discuss lessons learned, develop action plans, and strategize next steps. To disseminate knowledge and raise awareness, CWLA cosponsored the first national symposium on Community and Child Welfare with the Boston Home for Little Wanderers and the University at Albany School of Social Welfare in September 2003. The symposium featured a keynote speech by Karl Dennis called Building Innovations for CommunityBased Care and 28 workshops in four tracks: understanding communities, leadership without easy answers, social and economic justice and developing, and maximizing and sustaining resources. The symposium featured collaborative practices involving parents, university-agency partnerships, and public and private child and family service agencies from across the country and Canada. Participants shared successful program innovation, culturally appropriate models, research projects, and system reform efforts. The Annie E. Casey Foundation sponsored the closing plenary on new models for funding and delivering services though place-based philanthropy and services, which featured Ira Barbell. The community-building movement has also been advanced by the CWLA Community Advisory Group, which is composed of representatives from more than 20 member agencies. This group has provided direction and leadership to CWLA's efforts to identify successful approaches and to help change professional practice. Sokoni Karanja, President, Center for New Horizons, Illinois, and James Mills, Executive Director Juvenile Welfare Board of Pinellas County, Florida, cochair this advisory group. The group convenes regional meetings, has developed values and principles for community building, and represents key child welfare stakeholders who are at the forefront of communitybuilding efforts. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».