MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W333903226

Advancing 21st-Century Child Welfare through Community Building

2005· article· en· W333903226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steve Hornberger, Katherine Briar-Lawson

Bibliographic record

VenueChild welfare · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandateWelfareContext (archaeology)Public relationsPopulationFamily preservationSocial workSocial WelfarePolitical scienceExtended familyEconomic growthSociologyMedicineLawEconomicsGeographyEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We know that no one child- and family-serving system has the mandate, resources, or reach to address the personal issues or social and community conditions that are related to risk factors faced by families involved with child welfare systems. Hundreds of thousands of children and families are helped every day by the child welfare system and other child- and family-serving systems. Millions more, however, do not have access to available, appropriate, or equitable services and supports. For far too many children and families, the failure to meet these human needs and basic rights has significant consequences. This includes lives filled with pain, suffering, and quiet desperation. Even so, as the articles in this volume suggest, we are learning and succeeding. Community building is becoming an essential part of all child and family practice. When we who work in or influence these systems; fundamentally change our roles with one another; change our relationships with the children, youth, and families we serve; and actively engage community stakeholders, we provide more strategic supports and can collaboratively achieve more effective outcomes for this most vulnerable population. This is the work before us. Early social reformers and Progressive Era activists called for community improvements to advance child and family well-being. In fact, for more than a century, researchers have argued that vulnerable children can be most effectively served in the context of their families and communities. Although family-centered and family support movements have evolved, especially in the past two decades, few if any comparable undertakings have occurred in community building. The Child Welfare League of America's (CWLA) National Framework for Community Action represents one of the first organizing tools for community building to advance child welfare. Reframing the concerns of vulnerable children and families as community-building issues places new challenges before policymakers, administrators, front-line service providers, and academics. Those at the forefront who develop the tools, models, and conceptual frameworks for community building need an opportunity to discuss lessons learned, develop action plans, and strategize next steps. To disseminate knowledge and raise awareness, CWLA cosponsored the first national symposium on Community and Child Welfare with the Boston Home for Little Wanderers and the University at Albany School of Social Welfare in September 2003. The symposium featured a keynote speech by Karl Dennis called Building Innovations for CommunityBased Care and 28 workshops in four tracks: understanding communities, leadership without easy answers, social and economic justice and developing, and maximizing and sustaining resources. The symposium featured collaborative practices involving parents, university-agency partnerships, and public and private child and family service agencies from across the country and Canada. Participants shared successful program innovation, culturally appropriate models, research projects, and system reform efforts. The Annie E. Casey Foundation sponsored the closing plenary on new models for funding and delivering services though place-based philanthropy and services, which featured Ira Barbell. The community-building movement has also been advanced by the CWLA Community Advisory Group, which is composed of representatives from more than 20 member agencies. This group has provided direction and leadership to CWLA's efforts to identify successful approaches and to help change professional practice. Sokoni Karanja, President, Center for New Horizons, Illinois, and James Mills, Executive Director Juvenile Welfare Board of Pinellas County, Florida, cochair this advisory group. The group convenes regional meetings, has developed values and principles for community building, and represents key child welfare stakeholders who are at the forefront of communitybuilding efforts. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild welfareSame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207