Seeing the Invisible: The Introduction and Development of Electron Microscopy in Britain, 1935–1945
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTIONSpring, 1941. The German campaigns in the Balkans are strengthening the Nazi domination of continental Europe. The Lend-Lease bill signed by Roosevelt on 1 1 March has broken any neutrality pretence of the USA. War material is being sold, transferred or leased to the Allied nations in the name of assisting US defence. The war is about to become global and US and British leaders discuss strategy in the event that the USA finally enters actively into the war. In this context, the British physicist Charles Galton Darwin (1887-1962) is appointed Director of the British Central Scientific Office in Washington - an institution conceived to promote closer contact and exchange of information on uranium investigation between US and British scientists.1 Darwin is one of the British scientists involved in the work on an atom bomb project. He spends almost one year in Washington. During this time, he reports to the physicist and member of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR),2 Edward Victor Appleton (1892-1965), on the electron microscope, strongly advocating for the importation of several of these instruments.3 What was this new apparatus? Why was there such an interest in it? Was it expected to help in the war effort at all?This paper explores the introduction of electron microscopy in Britain in the early 1940s. It deals not only with the interest that the electron microscope originally awoke amongst some scholars, but also with the doubts and reluctance shown by several scientists - particularly life scientists - towards its development and potential uses. I contend that the specific context of World War ? was crucial in overcoming these differences, favouring the introduction of the electron microscope in Britain. It was the thread of chemical and biological warfare, together with industrial interests and the prospective uses of the electron microscope to the war effort, that finally made British scientists and policymakers advocate for the importation of several electron microscopes and for the development of electron microscopy in the country.THE EARLY DAYSThe development of the electron microscope in the 1930s had been possible thanks to the improved understanding of cathode ray tubes, together with the progress in techniques for achieving high vacuums. In 1928, Hans Busch (1884-1973) had demonstrated and proved mathematically how coils that generate a magnetic field of rotational symmetry could be used to focus electron beams. Soon after this, work on the development of electron microscopy began in Germany, such as that at the Allgemeine Elektrizitats-Gesellschaft (AEG) under the leadership of the head of the physics laboratories Ernst Bruche (1900-85). However, it was the engineers from the Technische Hochschule of Berlin Max Knoll (1897-1969) andErnst Ruska (1906-88) who in the early 1930s, using some of the methods and apparatus already developed to some extent for the purpose of cathode-ray oscillography, were the pioneers of the construction of an electron microscope in Germany.4The publication of the first results obtained by the Germans, though still very modest, opened the doors for the development of several electron microscope projects in countries such as the USA, Canada, Belgium, and Great Britain. A good example is that of Ladislaus Marton (1901-79), a physical chemist at the Free University of Brussels and one of the pioneers not only of electron microscopy, but also of the application of electron microscopy to biomedical studies. In fact, he was one of the individuals involved in the development of electron microscopy both in Belgium and America, where the Radio Corporation of America Company (RCA) was to play a crucial role.It was not Marton but James Hillier (191 5-2007), a postgraduate student who was building an electron microscope for his doctoral research in physics at the University of Toronto, who produced the first commercial American electron microscope for the RCA in February 1940 - just a few months after the German firm Siemens had offered the first commercial model. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle