Homelessness and Criminal Exploitation of Russian Minors: Realities, Resources, and Legal Remedies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The demographics of the Russian Federation are alarming. According to Russian president Vladimir Putin, the population of the country declines by roughly 750,000 persons per year.(1) If that trend continues, there will be fewer than twenty-two million Russian citizens in 2015.(2) Numerous problems account for the declining population: out-migration, as well as high infant mortality rates and low life expectancy rates that are in turn results of high unemployment and increased poverty, infectious diseases, environmental hazards, and substance abuse.(3) President Putin has addressed some of the problems publicly, but few concrete measures have been taken to deal with them, with the exception of increasing minimum wages and pensions. What about the children who are born into Russian society? How are they being cared for? What protections does the society provide to its children so that they can grow to be healthy and productive contributors to the public good? One of the biggest threats to the future of Russia and to its demographic status is the ever-expanding problem of child homelessness and juvenile crime.(4) A homeless or neglected youth (beznadzornyi) is defined as a minor over whom control of behavior is absent as a result of the parents' or legal guardians' failure to fulfill, or to fulfill reliably, their child-rearing responsibilities. Besprizornyi--a more commonly used Russian term for a homeless youth--is defined legally as a beznadzornyi who lacks a place of residence (zhitel'stvo ili prebyvaniye); this usually refers to orphans and in some instances to children who have no place to sleep.(5) Homeless children are extremely vulnerable to enticement into criminal schemes and are increasingly being recruited, relocated, abused, and exploited for profit--especially by criminals such as drug traffickers, child molesters, black marketeers in transplant organs, and corrupt adoption agents seeking to exploit the demand for children's services. According to the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs (GUVD) in Moscow, several cases of missing children are reported daily and for every reported child there are undoubtedly countless others who leave home voluntary or forcibly, or who escape from orphanages without their absence being recorded.(6) I will address several aspects of the homelessness problem in Russia: environmental sources such as poverty and unemployment; similarities between the homelessness experienced in the interwar period in Soviet history and today; and law enforcement and legislative measures undertaken to address the problem. I call upon the Bush administration to bolster, with rhetorical and financial backing, programs that benefit children and the social welfare, health, and educational agencies that provide care for them in Russia. Source of the Problem: Nature or Nurture? Homelessness and juvenile crime are related phenomena, and many criminologists and sociologists call homelessness the mother of juvenile crime. As in many spheres of social science, the sources of these problems are debated and are usually placed either with factors (such as genetics or child-rearing practices) or with adverse factors (such as poverty and unemployment). Although the debate has gone back and forth historically, in recent years many criminologists in the West have embraced the developmental over the situational factors and focused research on dysfunctional families and child-rearing practices. Psychological, physical, and sexual forms of abuse encountered in family settings are deemed the key determinants of homelessness, juvenile crime, and enhanced vulnerability to exploitation. Child homelessness is often a result of harmful familial dynamics in which children are physically, emotionally, or psychologically abused by alcohol- or drug-addicted, or psychologically impaired parents. Research among Canadian sociologists, however, seeks to break ranks and demonstrate that bleak situations--shortages of food and housing due to socioeconomic conditions--in which children find themselves are better determinants in predicting homelessness and juvenile crime. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».