Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction THIRTY YEARS AGO, WORKING WITH A COLLECTIVE IN BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, I wrote about the emergence of a leftist tendency in the United States that has begun to challenge the hegemonic domination of the field [of criminology] by liberal scholars. The roots of this radicalism are to be found in political struggles--the Civil Rights Movement, Third World liberation inside as well as outside the United States, and anti-imperialist movements--and in the writings of participants in these struggles (Platt, 1974: 2). The success of this criminology movement, which had a considerable influence over public debates about crime and justice, was short-lived. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon successfully politicized the issue of crime and linked widespread anxieties about racial equality to the call for law and order. Ronald Reagan's presidency accelerated the shift to the right in criminal justice policies and inaugurated an unprecedented growth in prison construction and rates of imprisonment. By the time that the Democratic Party reclaimed the White House under Bill Clinton's leadership, the entire political establishment had united around a discourse of authoritarian populism to justify an apartheid system of justice. During the hegemony of law and order, a progressive viewpoint about crime and justice retained a precarious foothold within academia and a handful of nonprofit and community-based organizations continued to articulate critiques of the criminal justice system. But the public influence of the radical activism of the 1970s had dissipated by the 1990s, relegated to historical footnotes and nostalgia, or used by the Right to denounce the excesses of the New Left. Recently, we have witnessed the revival of prison-related activism in the United States. In September 1998, the organization Critical Resistance brought together more than 3,000 people for a conference in Berkeley to explore ways of challenging the prison-industrial complex. A special issue of Social Justice (Vol. 27, No. 3, 2000) contains several papers delivered at this conference. A few years later, at a conference on Africana Studies Against Criminal held at Columbia University in April 2003, activists again convened to discuss the state of the new movement. Julia Sudbury--a member of Social Justice's editorial board and currently a Canada Research Council Chair in Social Justice, Equity and Diversity in Social Work at the University of Toronto--delivered one of the keynote speeches at the Columbia University conference. This speech, which is the basis for the article that appears ahead, clearly articulates the central themes of this new round of activism and makes connections between neoliberal globalization, U. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».