MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W349800614

Challenging the Prison-Industrial Complex: A Symposium

2004· article· en· W349800614 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tony Platt

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonImprisonmentWhite supremacyCriminal justiceHegemonyPoliticsLawSociologyPopulismPolitical radicalismDemocracyPolitical scienceEconomic JusticeCriminology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction THIRTY YEARS AGO, WORKING WITH A COLLECTIVE IN BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, I wrote about the emergence of a leftist tendency in the United States that has begun to challenge the hegemonic domination of the field [of criminology] by liberal scholars. The roots of this radicalism are to be found in political struggles--the Civil Rights Movement, Third World liberation inside as well as outside the United States, and anti-imperialist movements--and in the writings of participants in these struggles (Platt, 1974: 2). The success of this criminology movement, which had a considerable influence over public debates about crime and justice, was short-lived. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon successfully politicized the issue of crime and linked widespread anxieties about racial equality to the call for law and order. Ronald Reagan's presidency accelerated the shift to the right in criminal justice policies and inaugurated an unprecedented growth in prison construction and rates of imprisonment. By the time that the Democratic Party reclaimed the White House under Bill Clinton's leadership, the entire political establishment had united around a discourse of authoritarian populism to justify an apartheid system of justice. During the hegemony of law and order, a progressive viewpoint about crime and justice retained a precarious foothold within academia and a handful of nonprofit and community-based organizations continued to articulate critiques of the criminal justice system. But the public influence of the radical activism of the 1970s had dissipated by the 1990s, relegated to historical footnotes and nostalgia, or used by the Right to denounce the excesses of the New Left. Recently, we have witnessed the revival of prison-related activism in the United States. In September 1998, the organization Critical Resistance brought together more than 3,000 people for a conference in Berkeley to explore ways of challenging the prison-industrial complex. A special issue of Social Justice (Vol. 27, No. 3, 2000) contains several papers delivered at this conference. A few years later, at a conference on Africana Studies Against Criminal held at Columbia University in April 2003, activists again convened to discuss the state of the new movement. Julia Sudbury--a member of Social Justice's editorial board and currently a Canada Research Council Chair in Social Justice, Equity and Diversity in Social Work at the University of Toronto--delivered one of the keynote speeches at the Columbia University conference. This speech, which is the basis for the article that appears ahead, clearly articulates the central themes of this new round of activism and makes connections between neoliberal globalization, U. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World OrderSame topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207