MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W350138726

Screen Traffic: Movies, Multiplexes, and Global Culture

2004· article· en· W350138726 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Zoë Druick

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMovie theaterExhibitionHollywoodFilm industryMedia studiesSociologyEntertainmentPopular cultureModernityMaterialismArgument (complex analysis)AestheticsHistoryPolitical scienceLawArtArt history
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SCREEN TRAFFIC: MOVIES, MULTIPLEXES, AND GLOBAL CULTURE Charles R. Acland Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2003, 337pp. Scholars of exhibition are concerned with fraught intersection of political economy and cultural studies. In this timely new study, communications scholar Charles Acland raises bar for post-nationalist discussions of cinema culture by insisting that filmgoing must be approached a complex of industrial and cultural phenomena. Using a cultural materialist approach inspired by Raymond Williams, Acland argues that film must be considered a highly mutable site of international economics and individual emotional responses, encompassing technologies of reproduction alongside patterns of reception. Although has arguably been a enterprise since Hollywood began to aggressively develop international market in 1920s, Acland makes a compelling argument that culture became in a new way in 1980s when cinema was reconfigured a vertically integrated industry in wake of deregulation policies. Thus, his study concentrates on cinema exhibition practice a phenomenon of culture from mid-1980s to mid-1990s. The primary phenomenon under consideration here is shift in exhibition practices that emerged between 1986 and 1998, a period when grimy, utilitarian suburban multiplexes were replaced across North America by monstrous exurban space age megaplexes. Acland describes motion picture theatre an location at which discourses of audiences are being worked out and applied, and sites for mobility and flow of bodies, texts, and money. He associates these new theatrical settings with shrunken amusement parks, a logical next step in convergence of corporate entertainment industry during this period. In retrospect, Acland points out, this moment might also be seen last gasp of cinema such. Since 1998, emergent technology in cinema exhibition has been digitalisation, which potentially obviates many of metropolis/hinterland relations that have traditionally shaped cinemagoing landscape. Internet distribution of pirated mainstream films and independent productions threatens to displace-or at least radically alter-the importance of cinema a site of cultural dissemination. Informed by cultural theorists such Michel Foucault, Antonio Gramsci, Marcia Landy, and Arjun Appadurai, Acland explores the industrial and popular discourses about contemporary commercial cinema and its patrons that have become common sense. He effectively argues that filmgoing experience involves an integration of such diverse elements architecture, sound, computer graphics, and consumption of food, well watching films themselves. Acland demonstrates that despite constant shifts in exhibition practices, filmgoing continues to be an essential experience of everyday life in modern world. Cinemagoing is banal, it is erotic, it is civil, it is unruly, it is an everyday site of regulated and unregulated possibility. Acland is concerned not only with shifts in industry, but with how these shifts have contributed to a felt internationalism that might open up possibilities for a more resistant global popular, although on this point Acland is more evocative than descriptive. [P]opular cosmopolitanism needs to be taken seriously, he writes, as a pervasive mode for negotiating and managing reigning ideas and experiences of economies and cultures. Although mainly focussed on American industry, or what others have called Global Hollywood, Screen Traffic includes an extensive examination of Canada a special example of American globalization, both a site of production and a not-quite-foreign market. For Canadian viewers, Acland observes that cinemagoing most often essentially takes you away from your national home. Paradoxically, perceived foreignness of much indigenous, government-sponsored Canadian cinema distinguishes it from popular cinemagoing tastes. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,476
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,932

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207