MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W350138726

Screen Traffic: Movies, Multiplexes, and Global Culture

2004· article· en· W350138726 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Zoë Druick

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterExhibitionHollywoodFilm industryMedia studiesSociologyEntertainmentPopular cultureModernityMaterialismArgument (complex analysis)AestheticsHistoryPolitical scienceLawArtArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SCREEN TRAFFIC: MOVIES, MULTIPLEXES, AND GLOBAL CULTURE Charles R. Acland Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2003, 337pp. Scholars of exhibition are concerned with fraught intersection of political economy and cultural studies. In this timely new study, communications scholar Charles Acland raises bar for post-nationalist discussions of cinema culture by insisting that filmgoing must be approached a complex of industrial and cultural phenomena. Using a cultural materialist approach inspired by Raymond Williams, Acland argues that film must be considered a highly mutable site of international economics and individual emotional responses, encompassing technologies of reproduction alongside patterns of reception. Although has arguably been a enterprise since Hollywood began to aggressively develop international market in 1920s, Acland makes a compelling argument that culture became in a new way in 1980s when cinema was reconfigured a vertically integrated industry in wake of deregulation policies. Thus, his study concentrates on cinema exhibition practice a phenomenon of culture from mid-1980s to mid-1990s. The primary phenomenon under consideration here is shift in exhibition practices that emerged between 1986 and 1998, a period when grimy, utilitarian suburban multiplexes were replaced across North America by monstrous exurban space age megaplexes. Acland describes motion picture theatre an location at which discourses of audiences are being worked out and applied, and sites for mobility and flow of bodies, texts, and money. He associates these new theatrical settings with shrunken amusement parks, a logical next step in convergence of corporate entertainment industry during this period. In retrospect, Acland points out, this moment might also be seen last gasp of cinema such. Since 1998, emergent technology in cinema exhibition has been digitalisation, which potentially obviates many of metropolis/hinterland relations that have traditionally shaped cinemagoing landscape. Internet distribution of pirated mainstream films and independent productions threatens to displace-or at least radically alter-the importance of cinema a site of cultural dissemination. Informed by cultural theorists such Michel Foucault, Antonio Gramsci, Marcia Landy, and Arjun Appadurai, Acland explores the industrial and popular discourses about contemporary commercial cinema and its patrons that have become common sense. He effectively argues that filmgoing experience involves an integration of such diverse elements architecture, sound, computer graphics, and consumption of food, well watching films themselves. Acland demonstrates that despite constant shifts in exhibition practices, filmgoing continues to be an essential experience of everyday life in modern world. Cinemagoing is banal, it is erotic, it is civil, it is unruly, it is an everyday site of regulated and unregulated possibility. Acland is concerned not only with shifts in industry, but with how these shifts have contributed to a felt internationalism that might open up possibilities for a more resistant global popular, although on this point Acland is more evocative than descriptive. [P]opular cosmopolitanism needs to be taken seriously, he writes, as a pervasive mode for negotiating and managing reigning ideas and experiences of economies and cultures. Although mainly focussed on American industry, or what others have called Global Hollywood, Screen Traffic includes an extensive examination of Canada a special example of American globalization, both a site of production and a not-quite-foreign market. For Canadian viewers, Acland observes that cinemagoing most often essentially takes you away from your national home. Paradoxically, perceived foreignness of much indigenous, government-sponsored Canadian cinema distinguishes it from popular cinemagoing tastes. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207