Potential of dual-pol TerraSAR-X data for Land Cover Classification in Arctic Tundra Landscapes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Arctic land covers play a critical role in linking the land, atmosphere, and oceans of the Arctic System as a whole, and in determining the role terrestrial ecosystems play in feedbacks to climatic change. Point measurements of ground and soil temperatures, as well as energy fluxes or associated surface parameters like land cover, however, cannot adequately represent the spatial heterogeneity and complexity of Arctic environments. Remote sensing on the other hand, provides a means of obtaining continuous and regional information of high Arctic environments where existing data networks are sparse. \n \nThis study focuses on Arctic river deltas, namely the Lena Delta in northern Siberia and the Mackenzie Delta in Canada. Both areas are underlain by continuous permafrost. The surface is characterized by polygonal structures, thermo-erosion valleys, shallow lakes, and river channels. The vegetation cover is mainly composed of mosses, herbs, sedges, and shrubs. The surface is generally moist or wet, as the permafrost table acts as boundary for water drainage and evapotranspiration is low. Both deltas can be subdivided into unique geomorphologic units, which show differences in the soil texture, surface wetness and vegetation composition. In the Mackenzie Delta, recent tundra fires have also impacted the vegetation cover. Extensive ground truth data are available for both sites from field campaigns, automatic weather stations, and optical imagery. \n \nSAR intensity images alone are often insufficient for accurate classification of these environments, thus it is advantageous to include additional phase-related information. A high spatial resolution is essential to clearly distinguish land and water surfaces. The German X-band radar satellite TerraSAR-X can acquire dual polarized images, which enables the derivation of polarimetric features, including correlation coefficients, phase differences, polarization ratios, Kennaugh and dual-pol entropy / alpha decompositions and others. \n \nThe goal of this study is to identify suitable SAR features for the characterization of Arctic tundra land covers. Images were acquired during summer in stripmap mode, and after georeferencing and multilooking a pixel size of 12 meters was achieved. Backscattering intensities as well as scattering mechanism information were taken into account. The best feature combinations from the decompositions were then used as input for the land cover classification. Different processing methods and classification algorithms, both supervised and unsupervised, were tested with respect to the best classification results. The Transformed Divergence was also calculated to investigate class separability. \n \nFirst analyses showed for example, that double-bounce is the dominant scattering mechanism in wetlands, whereas odd-bounce is characteristic for unvegetated sandbanks. Thus these landscape covers can be distinguished, despite having similar backscattering intensities. Unsupervised classification methods have shown little potential to distinguish between the landscape units, whereas the supervised Maximum Likelihood classification has achieved acceptable accuracies. The application of morphological filters on the classification results have also been shown to reduce the number of miss-classifications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».