MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W37141553

Potential of dual-pol TerraSAR-X data for Land Cover Classification in Arctic Tundra Landscapes

2013· article· en· W37141553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Sobiech, Tobias Ullmann, Sarah Banks, Achim Roth, Wolfgang Dierking

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTundraPermafrostArcticArctic vegetationVegetation (pathology)Land coverPhysical geographyThermokarstEnvironmental scienceRiver deltaGeologyDeltaRemote sensingLand useGeographyOceanographyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic land covers play a critical role in linking the land, atmosphere, and oceans of the Arctic System as a whole, and in determining the role terrestrial ecosystems play in feedbacks to climatic change. Point measurements of ground and soil temperatures, as well as energy fluxes or associated surface parameters like land cover, however, cannot adequately represent the spatial heterogeneity and complexity of Arctic environments. Remote sensing on the other hand, provides a means of obtaining continuous and regional information of high Arctic environments where existing data networks are sparse. \n \nThis study focuses on Arctic river deltas, namely the Lena Delta in northern Siberia and the Mackenzie Delta in Canada. Both areas are underlain by continuous permafrost. The surface is characterized by polygonal structures, thermo-erosion valleys, shallow lakes, and river channels. The vegetation cover is mainly composed of mosses, herbs, sedges, and shrubs. The surface is generally moist or wet, as the permafrost table acts as boundary for water drainage and evapotranspiration is low. Both deltas can be subdivided into unique geomorphologic units, which show differences in the soil texture, surface wetness and vegetation composition. In the Mackenzie Delta, recent tundra fires have also impacted the vegetation cover. Extensive ground truth data are available for both sites from field campaigns, automatic weather stations, and optical imagery. \n \nSAR intensity images alone are often insufficient for accurate classification of these environments, thus it is advantageous to include additional phase-related information. A high spatial resolution is essential to clearly distinguish land and water surfaces. The German X-band radar satellite TerraSAR-X can acquire dual polarized images, which enables the derivation of polarimetric features, including correlation coefficients, phase differences, polarization ratios, Kennaugh and dual-pol entropy / alpha decompositions and others. \n \nThe goal of this study is to identify suitable SAR features for the characterization of Arctic tundra land covers. Images were acquired during summer in stripmap mode, and after georeferencing and multilooking a pixel size of 12 meters was achieved. Backscattering intensities as well as scattering mechanism information were taken into account. The best feature combinations from the decompositions were then used as input for the land cover classification. Different processing methods and classification algorithms, both supervised and unsupervised, were tested with respect to the best classification results. The Transformed Divergence was also calculated to investigate class separability. \n \nFirst analyses showed for example, that double-bounce is the dominant scattering mechanism in wetlands, whereas odd-bounce is characteristic for unvegetated sandbanks. Thus these landscape covers can be distinguished, despite having similar backscattering intensities. Unsupervised classification methods have shown little potential to distinguish between the landscape units, whereas the supervised Maximum Likelihood classification has achieved acceptable accuracies. The application of morphological filters on the classification results have also been shown to reduce the number of miss-classifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut)Same topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207