Perceptions of personal safety in custody among a sample of serious and violent incarcerated young offenders
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The new Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) (2003) contains the controversial sentencing option allowing young offenders convicted of certain serious and/or violent offences to receive adult length sentences.Critics of the YCJA, and specifically this sentencing option, argued that the impact of prison on young offenders was invariably negative and that society was neither protected, nor were incarcerated serious and violent offenders effectively deterred by longer sentences.Also, there is considerable research indicating that prisons are inherently violent institutions that cause fear among the most vulnerable incarcerated youth.The two predominant explanations for the high level of prison violence are the Importation model and the Deprivation model.The importation literature contends that prison violence is the result of the individual characteristics that offenders bring with them into the prison system.Conversely, the Deprivation model argues that it is the structure and nature of prisons that causes custody facilities to be violent.Utilizing a sample of 200 incarcerated serious and violent young offenders in Vancouver, B.C., this thesis examines the extent to which youth felt safe while in custody.In addition, a number of independent variables were assessed including age, gender, Aboriginal identity, offender classification, length of time spent in custody, being the victim of physical abuse, hard drug use, perceived levels of institutional violence, and level of custody to analyse their impact on youth's feelings of safety.Using a four stage multiple regression model indicated iii a robust relationship between perceived levels of institutional violence and feelings of safety.There were limitations to this thesis research primarily involving the use of a single indicator measure of safety and the absence of several other key independent variables, such as mental disorders within prison group associations, staff rules, and varied prison authority structures. CHAPTER TWO: PERCEPTIONS OF VIOLENCE AND SAFETY IN JUVENILE INSTITUTIONSFew doubt that prisons are violent.For decades, American and Canadian studies have confirmed this violence in the form of sexual assaults, beatings, and killings in correctional institutions (Bartollas, 1978; OIDonnell and Edgar, 1999;Maitland and Sluder, 1996).While the studies have discussed the extent and factors that contribute to extremely high perceptions of prison violence, what is not so apparent is the degree of safety that youth feel in custody.While it appears to be widely accepted that youth custody facilities to some extent are violent, and, therefore, incarcerated youth are at some risk for victimization, it is still unclear how this potential risk affects their perceived levels of safety.More specifically, is a youth's perception of violence related to their perceptions of safety?It appears from the lack of research literature, or even media attention, that the public, especially in Canada, is not fully aware of the impact of custody on youth.Still, the majority of Canadians are supportive of the use of prisons for serious and violent offenders (Corrado et al., 1992).As well, the introduction of adult length sentences for serious, violent, and repeat young offenders under the YCJA reflects the political concerns about public anger towards the perceived lack of punitive sentencing in the youth justice system, mainly in the form of lengthy prison sentences.Yet, when the public is made aware of the violence in custody, the typical response is to condemn the neglect, inhumanity, and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».