MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W39659482 · doi:10.1353/mos.2017.a650699

An Interview with Álvaro Siza

2017· article· en· W39659482 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Álvaro Siza Vieira, Dawne McCance

Notice bibliographique

RevueMosaic · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArchitectureArt historyPreambleArtVisual artsHumanitiesHistoryEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Portugal, where it seems that everyone you meet speaks knowledgeably proudly of his work, he called by his full name, Alvaro Siza Vieira. He is, of course, that country's most famous architect and, in keeping with the crossing of local global that has marked his entire career, he also internationally renowned a recipient of, among many other awards, the Pritzker Architecture Prize. Mosaic sought out Siza because he both architect artist: according to what he says, what he builds, literature architecture belong inseparably together. The following interview took place on 17 May 2002 in Siza's Rua Do Aleixo office in Oporto, Portugal originally appeared in Mosaic's special issue Literature Architecture (35.4, December 2002). Preamble preamble: n. a preliminary statement or an introductory part stating the reasons intent of what follows; v. lit., to walk before, hence to travel, over, f. L ambulare, to go about, take a turn, make a tour--walk. How to prepare for, preface, an interview with Alvaro Siza Vieira? As well as reading, I walked. In the first place, in Barcelona, it was a tour through the imagination of Antoni Gaudi: Parc Guell, Casa Batello, Casa Mila, and, especially, the Church of the Sagrada Familia, that unfinishable poem. During the Spanish Civil War, all fifty-eight of the churches of Barcelona were burned, save, of course, the Sagrada Familia: cast in cement, it survived the petrol to become part of the ravaged Spain that Alvaro Siza, as a boy, visited with his family. Perhaps the most memorable of those visits was the one he made at age fifteen, his first visit to Santiago de Compostela, where, outside the Cathedral of Saint James, watching workmen removing the pavement, replacing old stones with new, he was taken with the question of how we inherit tradition, how it that to remember to rebuild--a work that can never be completed. Travelling with this question of tradition, I was on the way, the camino, to Santiago myself, but before that came a turn north, to Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Bilbao, the cathedral become a museum--or, perhaps, housing the sculptures of Joseph Beuys Richard Serra, the museum, no longer a mere building, become a sculpture itself. After the flamboyance verticality of Gaudi Gehry, the encounter with Siza's Galician Centre of Contemporary Art in Santiago de Compostela altogether different. Here, in passing from one landscape into another, from the surrounding old city into the new building, one enters a place of respite, wonderfully tranquil, with its white marble white walls subtle plays of shade light--as welcoming as understated as the man himself. To walk through the Galician Centre of Contemporary Art, which designed as a kind of promenade, to experience something of the silence that has always tempted Siza. In the catalogue of the exhibition of his work that opened the Centre in 1995, Siza, who as much a writer as an architect, writes that, when reflecting on architecture, he always draws his example from writers, and among them, from the poets--those highly competent architects of register of dream; the inhabitants of solitude. It's a signature remark an apt prologue to this interview. That the remark appears in the catalogue on a page beside one of Siza's self-portraits--a sketch of himself drawing, a sketch that foregrounds his drawing hands--is also very apt. For, as we conducted this interview, sitting across from each other at a table in Siza's office, he began to draw on the Mosaic brochure I had brought along for him to sketch his points on the page. Drawing, he says, is language memory, the way to communicate construction with oneself others. I took the drawings away with me, as a memory of that day. DM Because some Mosaic readers might not be familiar with your work, I want to start, with your permission, by tracking some points in your professional career. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,838
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,327

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMosaicMême sujetArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignTravaux en français237 207