MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W39659482 · doi:10.1353/mos.2017.a650699

An Interview with Álvaro Siza

2017· article· en· W39659482 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Álvaro Siza Vieira, Dawne McCance

Bibliographic record

VenueMosaic · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureArt historyPreambleArtVisual artsHumanitiesHistoryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Portugal, where it seems that everyone you meet speaks knowledgeably proudly of his work, he called by his full name, Alvaro Siza Vieira. He is, of course, that country's most famous architect and, in keeping with the crossing of local global that has marked his entire career, he also internationally renowned a recipient of, among many other awards, the Pritzker Architecture Prize. Mosaic sought out Siza because he both architect artist: according to what he says, what he builds, literature architecture belong inseparably together. The following interview took place on 17 May 2002 in Siza's Rua Do Aleixo office in Oporto, Portugal originally appeared in Mosaic's special issue Literature Architecture (35.4, December 2002). Preamble preamble: n. a preliminary statement or an introductory part stating the reasons intent of what follows; v. lit., to walk before, hence to travel, over, f. L ambulare, to go about, take a turn, make a tour--walk. How to prepare for, preface, an interview with Alvaro Siza Vieira? As well as reading, I walked. In the first place, in Barcelona, it was a tour through the imagination of Antoni Gaudi: Parc Guell, Casa Batello, Casa Mila, and, especially, the Church of the Sagrada Familia, that unfinishable poem. During the Spanish Civil War, all fifty-eight of the churches of Barcelona were burned, save, of course, the Sagrada Familia: cast in cement, it survived the petrol to become part of the ravaged Spain that Alvaro Siza, as a boy, visited with his family. Perhaps the most memorable of those visits was the one he made at age fifteen, his first visit to Santiago de Compostela, where, outside the Cathedral of Saint James, watching workmen removing the pavement, replacing old stones with new, he was taken with the question of how we inherit tradition, how it that to remember to rebuild--a work that can never be completed. Travelling with this question of tradition, I was on the way, the camino, to Santiago myself, but before that came a turn north, to Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Bilbao, the cathedral become a museum--or, perhaps, housing the sculptures of Joseph Beuys Richard Serra, the museum, no longer a mere building, become a sculpture itself. After the flamboyance verticality of Gaudi Gehry, the encounter with Siza's Galician Centre of Contemporary Art in Santiago de Compostela altogether different. Here, in passing from one landscape into another, from the surrounding old city into the new building, one enters a place of respite, wonderfully tranquil, with its white marble white walls subtle plays of shade light--as welcoming as understated as the man himself. To walk through the Galician Centre of Contemporary Art, which designed as a kind of promenade, to experience something of the silence that has always tempted Siza. In the catalogue of the exhibition of his work that opened the Centre in 1995, Siza, who as much a writer as an architect, writes that, when reflecting on architecture, he always draws his example from writers, and among them, from the poets--those highly competent architects of register of dream; the inhabitants of solitude. It's a signature remark an apt prologue to this interview. That the remark appears in the catalogue on a page beside one of Siza's self-portraits--a sketch of himself drawing, a sketch that foregrounds his drawing hands--is also very apt. For, as we conducted this interview, sitting across from each other at a table in Siza's office, he began to draw on the Mosaic brochure I had brought along for him to sketch his points on the page. Drawing, he says, is language memory, the way to communicate construction with oneself others. I took the drawings away with me, as a memory of that day. DM Because some Mosaic readers might not be familiar with your work, I want to start, with your permission, by tracking some points in your professional career. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMosaicSame topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207