MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W40081545

Minority Police Applicants Concerns and Assessment of Occupational Roles

2006· article· en· W40081545 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jordan Kozey

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolicing Practices and Perceptions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical sciencePublic relationsCriminologyPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ARTICLE REVIEWED: Perrott, S.B. (1999). Visible Minority Applicant Concerns and Assessment of Occupational Role in the Era of Community-based Policing. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 9, 339-353. According Perrott (1999), recruiting minority officers has become an important focus in Western Democratic policing initiatives. In Canada, a variety of strategies have been implemented ensure that police officers representation is reflective of the social fabric. Although these initiatives aim at strengthening police-community partnerships (and also encourage workplace equity), studies conducted in both the United Kingdom and Canada suggest that many potential minority applicants remain reluctant join the police service. According Perrott (1999), for example, many African American youths are raised in an environment that results in suspicion of the police, creating major rifts between the two groups. The impact of this tension on minority recruitment has traditionally been assessed by researching attitudes toward the police service. An alternative approach understanding minority recruitment obstacles was put forward by Perrott (1999). Instead of looking at public attitudes toward police, Perrott (1999) surveyed 80 African-Canadian police applicants in an attempt document the obstacles that they perceive be existent with regard minority recruitment. The mean age of the subjects was 24 years with 95% of the subjects being 32 years of age or younger and the vast majority being male. The questionnaire was distributed over three separate sessions with three separate areas of interest. The first session was based on goals and obstacles and asked subjects rank order eight reasons why they would like become a police officer. The same technique was employed assess perceived obstacles regarding why a qualified African-Canadian may not want apply the police service. The second measure consisted of a 16-item Likert scale that assessed perceptions across a range of issues, including: police race relations, police attitudes compared other citizens, employment equity and police hiring practices, and job-related feelings of efficacy. Also assessed was the personal/group discrimination discrepancy (PGDD), a test examine the extent which disadvantaged group members perceive more discrimination towards their ethnic group than toward themselves as individuals (Taylor et al., 1990; Wright & Ruggiero, 1991). The 'across-perceiver' discrepancy (Perrott & Taylor, 1994) was also examined verify how close minority applicants felt the police were them and vice versa. Although the PGDD and across perceiver discrepancy measure have traditionally been employed as two separate and distinct assessment tools, they were used together in this case measure how perceptual discrepancies may hinder minority recruitment and encumber police race relations. The last measure employed a 30-item Right Wing Authoritarian scale measure predisposed authoritarianism tendencies in applicants. The results of the study provided a number of interesting findings with regard police recruitment of minorities. (1) Goals and Obstacles--The highest priority assigned by subjects regarding why they wanted become a police officer was to serve the community. Interestingly, the option of to serve the black community ranked 5th on the list in priority, while being a role model was deemed be the second most important consideration for becoming a police officer. Lower rankings were assigned excitement and prestige as motivators for becoming a police officer. Perceived obstacles joining the police service were divided into a number of major themes and sub-themes. The most profound obstacle ranked by the applicants consisted of concerns about prejudice at the level of police-community (i.e., dealing with racist officers). Thirteen of the 35 subjects who ranked this as their first concern were shown also have a general mistrust toward police officers or have developed a negative attitude towards officers over the years. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,466
Écart entre enseignants0,378 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPolicing Practices and PerceptionsTravaux en français237 207