MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W40081545

Minority Police Applicants Concerns and Assessment of Occupational Roles

2006· article· en· W40081545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jordan Kozey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePublic relationsCriminologyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ARTICLE REVIEWED: Perrott, S.B. (1999). Visible Minority Applicant Concerns and Assessment of Occupational Role in the Era of Community-based Policing. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 9, 339-353. According Perrott (1999), recruiting minority officers has become an important focus in Western Democratic policing initiatives. In Canada, a variety of strategies have been implemented ensure that police officers representation is reflective of the social fabric. Although these initiatives aim at strengthening police-community partnerships (and also encourage workplace equity), studies conducted in both the United Kingdom and Canada suggest that many potential minority applicants remain reluctant join the police service. According Perrott (1999), for example, many African American youths are raised in an environment that results in suspicion of the police, creating major rifts between the two groups. The impact of this tension on minority recruitment has traditionally been assessed by researching attitudes toward the police service. An alternative approach understanding minority recruitment obstacles was put forward by Perrott (1999). Instead of looking at public attitudes toward police, Perrott (1999) surveyed 80 African-Canadian police applicants in an attempt document the obstacles that they perceive be existent with regard minority recruitment. The mean age of the subjects was 24 years with 95% of the subjects being 32 years of age or younger and the vast majority being male. The questionnaire was distributed over three separate sessions with three separate areas of interest. The first session was based on goals and obstacles and asked subjects rank order eight reasons why they would like become a police officer. The same technique was employed assess perceived obstacles regarding why a qualified African-Canadian may not want apply the police service. The second measure consisted of a 16-item Likert scale that assessed perceptions across a range of issues, including: police race relations, police attitudes compared other citizens, employment equity and police hiring practices, and job-related feelings of efficacy. Also assessed was the personal/group discrimination discrepancy (PGDD), a test examine the extent which disadvantaged group members perceive more discrimination towards their ethnic group than toward themselves as individuals (Taylor et al., 1990; Wright & Ruggiero, 1991). The 'across-perceiver' discrepancy (Perrott & Taylor, 1994) was also examined verify how close minority applicants felt the police were them and vice versa. Although the PGDD and across perceiver discrepancy measure have traditionally been employed as two separate and distinct assessment tools, they were used together in this case measure how perceptual discrepancies may hinder minority recruitment and encumber police race relations. The last measure employed a 30-item Right Wing Authoritarian scale measure predisposed authoritarianism tendencies in applicants. The results of the study provided a number of interesting findings with regard police recruitment of minorities. (1) Goals and Obstacles--The highest priority assigned by subjects regarding why they wanted become a police officer was to serve the community. Interestingly, the option of to serve the black community ranked 5th on the list in priority, while being a role model was deemed be the second most important consideration for becoming a police officer. Lower rankings were assigned excitement and prestige as motivators for becoming a police officer. Perceived obstacles joining the police service were divided into a number of major themes and sub-themes. The most profound obstacle ranked by the applicants consisted of concerns about prejudice at the level of police-community (i.e., dealing with racist officers). Thirteen of the 35 subjects who ranked this as their first concern were shown also have a general mistrust toward police officers or have developed a negative attitude towards officers over the years. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolicing Practices and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207