Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vladimir Soloviev. Heart of Reality: Essays on Beauty, and Ethics. Ed. and trans. by Vladimir Wozniuk. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2003. xviii, 244 pp. Index, cloth.In the last quarter of the nineteenth century, Russian philosopher and theologian Vladimir Solov'ev was a towering figure in Russian intellectual life, comparable in many ways to Dostoevsky and Tolstoy. Today, however, Solov'ev is little known in the West, partially because little of his work is available in English. Vladimir Wozniuk is trying to change that. Yale University Press published his Politics, Law and Morality: Essays by V. S. Soloviev in 2000 and now his new anthology samples Solov'ev's aesthetic and literary studies.Wozniuk has organized this new volume around four on and love, sandwiched between Solov'ev's three addresses on Dostoevsky from the early 1880s on one side, and essays on the poets Pushkin, Lermontov and Mickiewicz from the late 1890s, on the other (p. xii). An Appendix contains Solov'ev's short piece defending Dostoevsky against Konstantin Leontiev's criticism, and three reviews in which Solov'ev sarcastically panned early works of Symbolist poetry.The coherence of the volume rests on the core essays, and the two, Beauty in Nature and The Universal Meaning of are certainly central to an understanding of Solov'ev's aesthetics. Readers who see Solov'ev as a mystical writer will be surprised by the essay on nature, which is concerned with concretely sorting out why some animals are beautiful and some ugly. Solov'ev relied here heavily on Darwin, whose historical approach to natural phenomena he found attractive. Solov'ev's conclusion that beauty exists objectively in nature leads to the essay on art, which Solov'ev sees as the connecting link between the beauty of nature and the beauty of the Ideal life to come. Art is a kind of inspired prophecy which captures flashes of eternal beauty in the present and anticipates the beauty of the future. In the third core article, First Step toward a Positive Aesthetic, Solov'ev rejected the arts for art's sake notions of the 1890s in favor of a position which values art for contributing to humanity's progress toward the Kingdom of God. Another surprise awaits the reader here, because the first step to a positive aesthetics praised by Solov'ev turns out to be a book by the left-wing critic Nikolai Chernyshevsky, who defended the idea, central to Solov'ev's aesthetics, that artistic activity must serve the common goal of humanity. final and longest core essay, The Meaning of Love, seems out of place here, especially since it is already available in English translation in a paperback edition. Motivated by the publication of Tolstoy's Kreutzer Sonata, Solov'ev argued that heterosexual love was an essential part of the process of human salvation. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».