A Phase IIa Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of S-1226 Administered by Nebulization in Subjects with Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Rationale There are approximately 35,000 people with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) in North America. This condition is characterized by impaired airway clearance resulting in chronic infection and bronchiectasis. Current airway clearance treatments include nebulized hypertonic saline and Recombinant Human DNase, which may be limited by bronchospasm and cost, respectively. S-1226, a novel biophysical therapeutic agent combines carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) enriched air (a bronchodilator) with nebulized perflubron (PFOB), (a synthetic surfactant). They act synergistically to open airways, enhance mucus clearance, and increase blood oxygenation. We report preliminary results from a Phase II clinical trial. Methods An open label, single-center, Phase IIa study of subjects (≥14 years) with mild-moderate (FEV 1 40-80%) CF lung disease treated with multiple ascending doses of S-1226 (week one), followed by the highest tolerated dose for 5 consecutive days (week two). Each dose of S-1226 comprised three successive treatments of 3mL of perflubron nebulized (Circulaire®II) for two-minutes with CO 2 concentrations ranging from 4 to 12%. The oxygen concentration was maintained at ambient levels. Treatments were administered twice daily. Efficacy measurements included spirometry, lung clearance index (LCI), lung volumes, blood oxygenation (SPO 2 ), sputum weight and the respiratory domain of quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (CFQ-R). Safety included adverse event (AE) and tolerance monitoring, vital signs, and assessment of end-tidal CO 2 . Results We report preliminary data on safety and efficacy for six CF subjects. All subjects tolerated all doses of S-1226. There were 5 reported AEs in 3 subjects. All were mild and resolved spontaneously. End-tidal CO 2 immediately after treatment was comparable to baseline. SpO 2 (baseline 91-95%) rapidly improved in all subjects with treatment. Five of six subjects had improvements in their LCI. Three subjects that were compliant in collecting mucus showed increases of 14%, 29% and 64% over baseline. Percent predicted FEV 1 response was variable, decreasing initially with return to pre-treatment values at two weeks. Four of the six subjects reported improvements in CFQ-R scores, three of which showed a clinically important difference (> 4 points). An important observation was that S-1226 controlled irritant (but not productive) cough in all five subjects and at all concentrations of S-1226. Conclusions All doses of S-1226 were safe and well tolerated. Treatments with up to 12% extrinsic CO 2 over short periods of time did not result in an elevation of end-tidal CO 2. The preliminary efficacy results, including overall improved oxygen saturation, CFQ-R scores, increased expectorated mucus and LCI values provide evidence for potential beneficial effects of S-1226 for CF lung disease but require larger trials and longer-term treatments to fully assess efficacy in CF.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».