A Phase IIa Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of S-1226 Administered by Nebulization in Subjects with Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rationale There are approximately 35,000 people with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) in North America. This condition is characterized by impaired airway clearance resulting in chronic infection and bronchiectasis. Current airway clearance treatments include nebulized hypertonic saline and Recombinant Human DNase, which may be limited by bronchospasm and cost, respectively. S-1226, a novel biophysical therapeutic agent combines carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) enriched air (a bronchodilator) with nebulized perflubron (PFOB), (a synthetic surfactant). They act synergistically to open airways, enhance mucus clearance, and increase blood oxygenation. We report preliminary results from a Phase II clinical trial. Methods An open label, single-center, Phase IIa study of subjects (≥14 years) with mild-moderate (FEV 1 40-80%) CF lung disease treated with multiple ascending doses of S-1226 (week one), followed by the highest tolerated dose for 5 consecutive days (week two). Each dose of S-1226 comprised three successive treatments of 3mL of perflubron nebulized (Circulaire®II) for two-minutes with CO 2 concentrations ranging from 4 to 12%. The oxygen concentration was maintained at ambient levels. Treatments were administered twice daily. Efficacy measurements included spirometry, lung clearance index (LCI), lung volumes, blood oxygenation (SPO 2 ), sputum weight and the respiratory domain of quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (CFQ-R). Safety included adverse event (AE) and tolerance monitoring, vital signs, and assessment of end-tidal CO 2 . Results We report preliminary data on safety and efficacy for six CF subjects. All subjects tolerated all doses of S-1226. There were 5 reported AEs in 3 subjects. All were mild and resolved spontaneously. End-tidal CO 2 immediately after treatment was comparable to baseline. SpO 2 (baseline 91-95%) rapidly improved in all subjects with treatment. Five of six subjects had improvements in their LCI. Three subjects that were compliant in collecting mucus showed increases of 14%, 29% and 64% over baseline. Percent predicted FEV 1 response was variable, decreasing initially with return to pre-treatment values at two weeks. Four of the six subjects reported improvements in CFQ-R scores, three of which showed a clinically important difference (> 4 points). An important observation was that S-1226 controlled irritant (but not productive) cough in all five subjects and at all concentrations of S-1226. Conclusions All doses of S-1226 were safe and well tolerated. Treatments with up to 12% extrinsic CO 2 over short periods of time did not result in an elevation of end-tidal CO 2. The preliminary efficacy results, including overall improved oxygen saturation, CFQ-R scores, increased expectorated mucus and LCI values provide evidence for potential beneficial effects of S-1226 for CF lung disease but require larger trials and longer-term treatments to fully assess efficacy in CF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".