Correction to ‘The double-stranded RNA-binding protein, Staufen1, is an IRES-transacting factor regulating HIV-1 cap-independent translation initiation’
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Errors were introduced in Figure 3 during production of the article (1). The X-axis of Figure 3D should be ΔSV40 not SV40. The publisher apologises for these errors and wishes to correct Figure 3 as shown below. Staufen1 does not enhance alternative splicing of the dl HIV-1 IRES RNA nor increases the cryptic promoter activity of the dl HIV-1 DNA. (A, B) The dl HIV-1 IRES (150 ng) was cotransfected with a control scRNA (100 nM) or with siRLuc (100 nM), in the presence, or the absence (−), of the Stau155-HA3 (325 ng) plasmid. (A) Schematic representation of the dl reporter targeted by the siRNA RLuc (siRLuc) targeting the Renilla luciferase ORF (upper panel). Total protein extracts were prepared 48 hrs post-transfection. The expression of Stau155-HA3 was determined by western blot, using the GAPDHprotein as a loading control (lower panel). (B) RLuc and FLuc activities were measured and expressed relative to the values obtained with scRNA, set to 100% (RLA). Values shown are the mean (±SEM) for six independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by an ordinary two-way ANOVA test (*P < 0.01; ns, not significant). (C, D) HEK 293T cells were transfected with either the dl HIV-1 IRES (150 ng) or a promoterless ΔSV40-dl HIV-1 IRES (150 ng) vector in the presence, or the absence (−), of the Stau155-HA3 (325 ng) plasmid. 24 hrs post-transfection total protein extracts were prepared. (C) Schematic representation of the dl HIV-1 IRES and ΔSV40-dl HIV-1 IRES plasmids (upper panel). The expression of Stau155-HA3 was determined by western blot, using the GAPDH protein as a loading control (lower panel). (D) RLuc and FLuc activities were measured, and results are expressed as RLA relative to the activities obtained from the dl HIV-1 IRES vector when in the absence of the Stau155-HA3, set to 100%. Values shown in are the mean (±SEM) for three independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by an ordinary two-way ANOVA test (**** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant). Staufen1 does not enhance alternative splicing of the dl HIV-1 IRES RNA nor increases the cryptic promoter activity of the dl HIV-1 DNA. (A, B) The dl HIV-1 IRES (150 ng) was cotransfected with a control scRNA (100 nM) or with siRLuc (100 nM), in the presence, or the absence (−), of the Stau155-HA3 (325 ng) plasmid. (A) Schematic representation of the dl reporter targeted by the siRNA RLuc (siRLuc) targeting the Renilla luciferase ORF (upper panel). Total protein extracts were prepared 48 hrs post-transfection. The expression of Stau155-HA3 was determined by western blot, using the GAPDHprotein as a loading control (lower panel). (B) RLuc and FLuc activities were measured and expressed relative to the values obtained with scRNA, set to 100% (RLA). Values shown are the mean (±SEM) for six independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by an ordinary two-way ANOVA test (*P < 0.01; ns, not significant). (C, D) HEK 293T cells were transfected with either the dl HIV-1 IRES (150 ng) or a promoterless ΔSV40-dl HIV-1 IRES (150 ng) vector in the presence, or the absence (−), of the Stau155-HA3 (325 ng) plasmid. 24 hrs post-transfection total protein extracts were prepared. (C) Schematic representation of the dl HIV-1 IRES and ΔSV40-dl HIV-1 IRES plasmids (upper panel). The expression of Stau155-HA3 was determined by western blot, using the GAPDH protein as a loading control (lower panel). (D) RLuc and FLuc activities were measured, and results are expressed as RLA relative to the activities obtained from the dl HIV-1 IRES vector when in the absence of the Stau155-HA3, set to 100%. Values shown in are the mean (±SEM) for three independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by an ordinary two-way ANOVA test (**** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant). The published article has been updated. These corrections do not affect the results, discussion and conclusions presented in the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,026 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,064 | 0,049 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».