08. Concomitant Administration of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) with 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) Is Safe and Does Not Interfere with Immunogenicity of Either Vaccine in Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background This study assessed non-inferiority of humoral immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of RZV when the 1st dose was co-administered with PCV13 in adults ≥ 50 years of age (YOA) compared to sequential administration. Methods In this phase 3b, open-label, multi-center study (NCT03439657), adults were randomized 1:1 to receive either the 1st RZV dose co-administered with PCV13 at day (D)1 and the 2nd RZV dose at month (M)2 (Co-Ad group), or PCV13 at D1, the 1st RZV dose at M2 and the 2nd RZV dose at M4 (Control group). Co-primary confirmatory objectives were: (i) vaccine response rate (VRR) to RZV at 1 month post-dose 2 in Co-Ad group; (ii) non-inferiority of humoral responses to RZV (1 month post-RZV dose 2) and PCV13 (1 month post-PCV13) in Co-Ad group compared to Control group. Solicited adverse events (AEs) until D7 post-vaccination and unsolicited AEs until D30 post-vaccination were recorded. Serious AEs (SAEs) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were collected through 12 months post-RZV dose 2. Immunogenicity was performed in the per-protocol set (PPS) and safety analyses in the exposed set. Results Of 912 vaccinated adults, 863 were included in PPS (Co-Ad: 427; Control: 436). VRR for anti-glycoprotein E antibody concentrations was 99.1% in Co-Ad group. The predefined non-inferiority criteria for the humoral immune responses to RZV and PCV13 were met (Table 1). The overall frequency of solicited local AEs after RZV and PCV13 was comparable between Co-Ad and Control groups. Pain was the most common solicited local AE (Figure 1). The frequency of solicited general AEs was similar for the 1st RZV dose when co-administered with PCV13 or alone (57.4% vs 54.6%). Myalgia and fatigue were the most common solicited general AEs (Figure 2). The frequency (Co-Ad: 21.2%; Control: 23.1%) and nature of unsolicited AEs were balanced between groups. None of the reported SAEs, fatal SAEs, or pIMDs were vaccine-related. Table 1. Co-primary confirmatory objectives: vaccine response rate (VRR), and non-inferiority of the immune responses to RZV (1 month post-dose 2) and to PCV13 (1 month post-vaccination) in the Co-Ad group vs the Control group (per-protocol set) Figure 1. The incidence of solicited local adverse events (AEs) occurring within 7 days post-vaccination (overall/adult, exposed set) Figure 2. The incidence of solicited general adverse events (AEs) post-dose 1 occurring within 7 days post-vaccination (exposed set) Conclusion Co-administration of the 1st RZV dose with PCV13 showed non-inferior immune responses to sequential administration. The reactogenicity and safety of RZV in the Co-Ad group were within the range of the established safety profile of RZV. Co-administration of RZV with PCV13 may improve vaccination rates in ≥ 50 YOA population. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures Ji-Young Min, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Agnes Mwakingwe-Omar, MD, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Megan Riley, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Lifeter Yenwo Molo, BsC(hons) MSc(hons), GSK group of companies (Employee) Jyoti Soni, MA, GSK group of companies (Employee) Ginette Girard, MD, Diex Recherche Inc. Sherbrooke (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Jasur Danier, MD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».