MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200254666 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab466.211

08. Concomitant Administration of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) with 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) Is Safe and Does Not Interfere with Immunogenicity of Either Vaccine in Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years

2021· article· en· W4200254666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ji-Young Min, Agnes Mwakingwe-Omar, Megan Riley, Lifeter Yenwo Molo, Jyoti Soni, Ginette Girard, Jasur Danier

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReactogenicityImmunogenicityVaccinationAdverse effectMeningococcal vaccinePneumococcal conjugate vaccineImmunologyPediatricsImmunizationImmune systemInternal medicineAntibioticsMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background This study assessed non-inferiority of humoral immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of RZV when the 1st dose was co-administered with PCV13 in adults ≥ 50 years of age (YOA) compared to sequential administration. Methods In this phase 3b, open-label, multi-center study (NCT03439657), adults were randomized 1:1 to receive either the 1st RZV dose co-administered with PCV13 at day (D)1 and the 2nd RZV dose at month (M)2 (Co-Ad group), or PCV13 at D1, the 1st RZV dose at M2 and the 2nd RZV dose at M4 (Control group). Co-primary confirmatory objectives were: (i) vaccine response rate (VRR) to RZV at 1 month post-dose 2 in Co-Ad group; (ii) non-inferiority of humoral responses to RZV (1 month post-RZV dose 2) and PCV13 (1 month post-PCV13) in Co-Ad group compared to Control group. Solicited adverse events (AEs) until D7 post-vaccination and unsolicited AEs until D30 post-vaccination were recorded. Serious AEs (SAEs) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were collected through 12 months post-RZV dose 2. Immunogenicity was performed in the per-protocol set (PPS) and safety analyses in the exposed set. Results Of 912 vaccinated adults, 863 were included in PPS (Co-Ad: 427; Control: 436). VRR for anti-glycoprotein E antibody concentrations was 99.1% in Co-Ad group. The predefined non-inferiority criteria for the humoral immune responses to RZV and PCV13 were met (Table 1). The overall frequency of solicited local AEs after RZV and PCV13 was comparable between Co-Ad and Control groups. Pain was the most common solicited local AE (Figure 1). The frequency of solicited general AEs was similar for the 1st RZV dose when co-administered with PCV13 or alone (57.4% vs 54.6%). Myalgia and fatigue were the most common solicited general AEs (Figure 2). The frequency (Co-Ad: 21.2%; Control: 23.1%) and nature of unsolicited AEs were balanced between groups. None of the reported SAEs, fatal SAEs, or pIMDs were vaccine-related. Table 1. Co-primary confirmatory objectives: vaccine response rate (VRR), and non-inferiority of the immune responses to RZV (1 month post-dose 2) and to PCV13 (1 month post-vaccination) in the Co-Ad group vs the Control group (per-protocol set) Figure 1. The incidence of solicited local adverse events (AEs) occurring within 7 days post-vaccination (overall/adult, exposed set) Figure 2. The incidence of solicited general adverse events (AEs) post-dose 1 occurring within 7 days post-vaccination (exposed set) Conclusion Co-administration of the 1st RZV dose with PCV13 showed non-inferior immune responses to sequential administration. The reactogenicity and safety of RZV in the Co-Ad group were within the range of the established safety profile of RZV. Co-administration of RZV with PCV13 may improve vaccination rates in ≥ 50 YOA population. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures Ji-Young Min, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Agnes Mwakingwe-Omar, MD, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Megan Riley, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Lifeter Yenwo Molo, BsC(hons) MSc(hons), GSK group of companies (Employee) Jyoti Soni, MA, GSK group of companies (Employee) Ginette Girard, MD, Diex Recherche Inc. Sherbrooke (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Jasur Danier, MD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207