Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Martin Edward Charlton (1957–2021) Martin Charlton was one of the leading pioneers of quantitative geography and geocomputation whose work helped inspire the recent resurgence of spatial analysis and geographic data science. He was born in Newcastle upon Tyne, where he attended the Royal Grammar School and subsequently the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, where he gained a First Class (Hons) degree in Town and Country Planning in 1978. After a short spell as a planner in Chichester, Martin returned to Newcastle University for the next 24 years, first registering as a PhD student with Stan Openshaw, then as a researcher in the Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, before achieving his first academic position as a Lecturer in the Department of Geography in 1991. In 2004, he cofounded the National Centre for Geocomputation at Maynooth University, Ireland where he remained until his retirement in 2020. Martin’s career spanned the (geo)computational revolution of the 1980s that resulted in the widespread use of computer programming for spatial analysis in geography leading to a core component of the current GIScience body of knowledge. His research was fundamental to many of the methodological innovations that are now central to the practice of quantitative geography: geodemographic classifications of census small area data, the creation of bespoke geographic information and mapping software, and a number of innovative spatial data analysis techniques. His research played a key role in two major contributions to the discipline: the Geographical Analysis Machine (GAM) in 1987 working with Stan Openshaw, Alan Craft, and many other collaborators, and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) in 1996 working with Stewart Fotheringham and Chris Brunsdon. Central to both the GAM and GWR was the idea of using innovative computational—and, critically, geocomputational—methods to explore and explain geographical patterns in data, moving away from “one size fits all” types of modeling applied uniformally across space, to focus on how outcomes and their causes vary across a map. Typically, Martin was responsible for the initial coding, frequently in Fortran and/or R, and the implementation of functions to undertake these operations, which were later developed into standalone tools and open source packages. Martin’s time spent at Newcastle spawned the widespread use of GAM and GWR, while at Maynooth, Martin developed a new small area geography for census dissemination, the expansion of the GWR methodology to a GW modeling paradigm and smart (programmable) city projects and dashboards. Martin has left us with a large and impressive body of research which currently stands at 22,000+ citations from 200+ publications. As well as considering his reputation in this metric-defined manner, with Martin we fondly remember his unique approach to academia. A memorable aspect of Martin’s talks was that, despite the content often relating to fairly abstract ideas in computing, statistics, or geographical data, there were always plenty of photographs to bring the subject to life and make it relevant to each and every member of the audience. These images were typically of people and places, and helped to tell the human story behind many of the ideas being discussed. For Martin these ideas were not purely mathematical abstractions, but concepts grounded in the people whose ideas they were, the motivations behind the ideas, and the places where the ideas were discussed. His work certainly contained complex mathematical ideas, but he was aware of the stories behind them, and made a place for their telling. This humanistic aspect was always of importance in his work. He would often remind us that the human geographical data we analyzed arose from the lives of people; in finding patterns we were understanding something deeper about these people, and hopefully influencing policies that would ultimately benefit them. Martin was an inspiring teacher. His lectures were entertaining and highly popular with students and he always made the time to help students struggling with the more difficult aspects of their studies, especially at dissertation submission time when the corridor outside his office would be lined by students waiting for Martin to patiently assist them with their geocomputational issues. This generosity with his time was extended to younger professional colleagues—we have heard many people recalling how he had helped them in their early careers, in some cases saying he was the very reason they became an academic in the first place. Martin was very much at home in his office—often 7 days a week—which again made him highly accessible. He thoroughly enjoyed applying geographical techniques to the wide range of research projects which his colleagues and students were grappling with. Hence, he has rather an eclectic mix of publications, ranging from cancer clustering through airborne LiDAR, to digital humanities. His work dealt with geographies as diverse as river channel dynamics in north Northumberland and the pyrogeography of sub-Saharan Africa. If there was a count of acknowledgments in dissertations, Martin’s metric would be extraordinary. Finally, we would like to remember Martin as our dear friend. Over many years, we have had numerous adventures together: writing books, giving talks, shifting pies, curries, and pints, and on at least one instance signing the Official Secrets Act. We traveled around the world, including visits to China, the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan, Brazil, and many European countries, and discussed ideas over a beer (actually rarely ‘a’ beer) in all of these places. In destinations with a cathedral or church, we would often accompany him to look at its organ, as Martin was a highly accomplished and passionate organist. However, even travels to places much closer to home were always a pleasure, thanks to the company he provided. Martin is missed not only as an excellent colleague but as our great friend and we are all the sorrier he was taken so early just as he should have set out to enjoy a full and well-earned retirement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle