MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4200407778 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-151493

Updated Results of a Phase 1/2 Study of Lower Dose CPX-351 for Patients with Int-2 or High Risk IPSS Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia after Failure to Hypomethylating Agents

2021· article· en· W4200407778 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo, Elias Jabbour, Zeev Estrov, Tapan M. Kadia, Farhad Ravandi, Kelly S. Chien, Graciela M. Nogueras‐González, Xiao Qin Dong, Stefan Faderl, Heather Schneider, Rosmy John, Meghan Meyer, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCytarabineChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaDaunorubicinInternal medicineAzacitidineMyelodysplastic syndromesHypomethylating agentGastroenterologyLeukemiaOncologySurgeryBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care of patients (pts) with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). HMA failure (HMA-F) is associated with poor outcomes, with a median survival of 4 to 6 months. CPX-351 is a dual drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin at a 5:1 molar ratio approved for the treatment of pts with newly-diagnosed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML with MDS-related changes. Here we present updated results of a phase 1/2 study of lower dose CPX-351 for high-risk MDS and CMML after HMA-F. METHODS: We designed a phase 1/2 clinical trial of CPX-351 for pts with MDS or CMML after HMA-F with Int-2 or High risk by IPSS, or Int-1 with >10% bone marrow blasts. The study included an initial phase 1 dose-escalation portion, following a 3+3 design, followed by a phase 2 dose expansion cohort. Dose escalation included 4 dose levels of CPX-351: 10 units/m 2 (daunorubicin 4.4mg/m 2 and cytarabine 10mg/m 2), 25 units/m 2 (daunorubicin 11mg/m 2 and cytarabine 25mg/m 2), 50 units/m 2 (daunorubicin 22mg/m 2 and cytarabine 50mg/m 2) and 75 units/m 2 (daunorubicin 33mg/m 2 and cytarabine 75mg/m 2). Therapy was administered intravenously on days 1, 3 and 5 of 28-day cycles during induction and on days 1 and 3 of re-induction or consolidation. In pts not achieving response after induction, the study allowed re-induction. The primary end point was to evaluate safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPX-351. Responses were evaluated following 2006 IWG criteria. The study included stopping rules for toxicity and futility. The Kaplan-Meir product-limit method was used to estimate median survival. RESULTS: At the current data cut-off of July 27 th 2021 a total of 17 pts have been treated: 15 in the phase 1 portion, and 2 in the phase 2. A total of 12 pts had MDS, and 5 have CMML. Pt characteristics are shown in Figure 1a. Four (24%), 11 (64%) and 2 (11%) pts had Int-1 risk by IPSS with >10%, Int-2 or High risk by IPSS, respectively. The median age was 72 years (range 59-87) and 65% pts were male. Baseline mutations are shown in Figure 1b. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-4) with a median of 16 (range 5-50) cycles of prior HMA. Three pts had received prior therapy with venetoclax. No DLTs were observed within the 28-day DLT evaluation window of the phase 1 portion. One pt treated at the 75units/m 2 dose level developed congestive heart failure with reduction in ejection fraction after cycle 2 of therapy. An additional 3 pts were included at 75units/m 2 dose level with no DLTs being observed. Enrollment on the phase 2 was initiated at 75units/m 2 with 2 pts treated so far. Overall, the median number of administered cycles of therapy is 2 (range 1-9). A total of 13 (76%) pts had non-hematological adverse events (Figure 1c). Eight-week mortality was 0%. Both pts in the dose-expansion cohort experienced cardiac complications including congestive heart failure without reduction in ejection fraction after cycle 2 of therapy in 1 pt, and right-sided heart failure with fluid overload after cycle 1 in 1 pt. All pts with cardiac events were >75 years of age but none had prior cardiac conditions. The median number of days from the start of cycle 1 to cycle 2 was 49 (range 28-83). Three pts required dose reductions due to cytopenias (2 at 75units/m 2 and 1 at 50units/m 2). All pts are evaluable for response with an overall response rate of 71% (n=12) including 6% CR (n=1), 59% mCR (n=10) and 6% PR (n=1) (Figure 1d). Four pts required re-induction prior to achieving mCR. Median number of cycles to best response was 1 (range 1-3). The median response duration was 2 months (0-10 months). Four pts (24%) proceeded to allogeneic-stem-cell transplantation after achieving response. Two (11%) pts relapsed and 2 (11%) had transformation to AML. With a median follow-up of 16.7 months, the median overall survival is 12.6 months (95% CI 4.11-21.15) (Figure 1e), and the median event-free survival is 5.0 months (95% CI 0.87-9.20) (Figure 1f). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggests lower doses of CPX-351 in higher-risk MDS and CMML after HMA-F can induce marrow responses and be used as a bridge to allogeneic stem-cell transplant. In older individuals (>75 years), the dose of 75units/m2 is associated with risk of cardiac toxicity. Enrollment is continuing at a dose of 50units/m 2. Further follow up is required for individuals <75 years of age who are transplant candidates. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jabbour: Amgen, AbbVie, Spectrum, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Genentech: Research Funding. Kadia: Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Other; Liberum: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Other; Genfleet: Other; Ascentage: Other; Cellonkos: Other; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Pulmotech: Other; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Grant/research support; Aglos: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Grant/research support; BMS: Other: Grant/research support; Cure: Speakers Bureau; Dalichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: Grant/research support; Jazz: Consultancy. Ravandi: Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Prelude: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Faderl: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kantarjian: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Jazz: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→