[Longitudinal association between work and self-rated health in older adults: a systematic review].
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective Japan's shortage in labor force due to a declining birth rate and aging population has led to the rapid development of various systems and work environments to promote the employment of older adults. With increasing expectations for the active participation of older adults in the labor market, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between work and physical and mental health in this population, as well as the challenges they face. In particular, self-rated health is an important health indicator that captures the overall health status of older adults, which is strongly related to the decline in life functions and the increase in healthy life expectancy. In this study, we examined the longitudinal association between work and self-rated health perception among older adults.Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (Igaku Chuo Zasshi in Japanese). The keywords selected for the search were "older adult," "employment," and "self-rated health." The inclusion criteria were i) the baseline age of study subjects was 60 years or older, ii) employment was used as an independent variable and self-rated health was used as a dependent variable, and iii) studies were longitudinal. The quality of the selected literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).Results As a result of the review, a total of five studies were accepted. Four studies were from Japan and one was from the United States. The NOS scores showed that all selected studies were of high quality, scoring 6 or 7 on a 9-point scale. Three of the five studies reported that older adults who were working had higher self-rated health than those who were not working. Two of the five studies reported no significant association between employment and self-rated health among older adults.Conclusion This systematic review suggested a significant relationship between work and self-rated health among older adults. However, the number of studies that focused on the longitudinal effect of employment was limited. Employment in later life is becoming increasingly common, therefore further evidence on its effect on health should be gathered.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».