MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205124775 · doi:10.1353/phx.2013.0026

Childhood in Ancient Athens: Iconography and Social History by Lesley A. Beaumont

2013· article· en· W4205124775 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Golden

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIconographyScholarshipRepresentation (politics)HistoryClassicsArt historyLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

200 PHOENIX Childhood in Ancient Athens: Iconography and Social History. By Lesley A. Beaumont. London and New York: Routledge. 2012. Pp. xvi, 303. Lesley Beaumont's book examines “the iconography of childhood from birth through the whole prepubertal phase of life as presented by Athenian two- and three-dimensional figured art produced between the late seventh and the late fourth century b.c.” (207). Learned if not lively, furnished with 120 illustrations and generous references to both ancient literary evidence and modern scholarship, it will immediately become a standard starting-point for discussions of the artistic representation of Athenian children. One strength is the insistence that there were not only many children in classical Athens (as in all pre-industrial communities), there were many childhoods too, varying according to class and gender, change throughout the life course and over time; if—when—our evidence is contradictory, it is not due only to the conventions of different artistic media and genres. In Part I, after a short résumé of scholarship and remarks on methodology (Chapter One), Beaumont (Chapter Two) outlines the stages of childhood which (rather than chronological age) govern the scheme of development reflected in Athenian iconography: birth and infancy, prepubescent childhood, pubescent youth. Beginning in the late sixth century, both later stages are subdivided for boys, the earlier for girls as well; in another hundred years older and younger pubescent girls are also visibly distinguished. These stages are signalled by a varied set of indicators: body shape and size, the location and length of hair, dress, gestures, attributes such as toys and pets, the relations between figures. Crude as they are, these visual cues often mask or deny distinctions, all the more since the gap between the adult male citizen and other groups, including children, was much greater than other discriminations. So both children and slaves are shown small, younger boys on vases may be painted with white like females, youths sometimes mourn like women and sometimes exhibit masculine self-control. In general, however, gender separation becomes starker with age and boys become more manlike as they approach maturity. Biological changes are tracked, not always precisely, by the progression of a ritual and social calendar. Infancy ends with the child’s first active participation in public cult, the Anthesteria; this is the occasion for the gifts of miniature wine-jugs, choes, though the children portrayed on them sometimes still crawl like babies. The cutting of hair at the koureion is a maturation rite for boys which likely lags biological and numerological puberty (at 14) by a couple of years. As for girls, since their own biological maturation guaranteed their readiness for marriage, more care was taken to identify that transition for them (by breasts, longer hair, a special mantle). Beaumont devotes two long chapters in Part II to this “juvenile life course,” from “Birth and Infancy” (45–103) to “The Developing Child” (104–206), before adding a clear and concise conclusion (207–211). Throughout, Beaumont examines individual images and their contexts with scrupulous care and collects countless comparanda in her 681 footnotes. Here are some of Beaumont’s noteworthy suggestions. Breastfeeding, almost absent from Athenian pots, is found on those from Etruria and other western sites and is very common among terracotta figurines (46, 54); also unusually, mortal childbirth turns up only from the late fifth/early fourth century, and then only in commemorative funereal or votive contexts (46–48). Swaddled infants appear in sculpted reliefs and terracotta; vase painters prefer to leave their arms free to gesture (50). On pots, mortal fathers, BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 201 unlike gods, do not interact with their babies, “since affective relationships between men and their young children did not constitute an element in the social construction of the ideal citizen male’s identity” (60). (A gravestone with an adult male and a young child, is viewed as an exceptional vignette of Athenian private life [97]). Beaumont supports many of Sanne Houby-Nielsen’s conclusions about children’s burials and the role of women in providing their grave goods, but does not agree that the relative scarcity of fourth-century evidence testifies to a new lack of interest; it is in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,341
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,648

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetClassical Antiquity StudiesTravaux en français237 207