MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205124775 · doi:10.1353/phx.2013.0026

Childhood in Ancient Athens: Iconography and Social History by Lesley A. Beaumont

2013· article· en· W4205124775 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Golden

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconographyScholarshipRepresentation (politics)HistoryClassicsArt historyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

200 PHOENIX Childhood in Ancient Athens: Iconography and Social History. By Lesley A. Beaumont. London and New York: Routledge. 2012. Pp. xvi, 303. Lesley Beaumont's book examines “the iconography of childhood from birth through the whole prepubertal phase of life as presented by Athenian two- and three-dimensional figured art produced between the late seventh and the late fourth century b.c.” (207). Learned if not lively, furnished with 120 illustrations and generous references to both ancient literary evidence and modern scholarship, it will immediately become a standard starting-point for discussions of the artistic representation of Athenian children. One strength is the insistence that there were not only many children in classical Athens (as in all pre-industrial communities), there were many childhoods too, varying according to class and gender, change throughout the life course and over time; if—when—our evidence is contradictory, it is not due only to the conventions of different artistic media and genres. In Part I, after a short résumé of scholarship and remarks on methodology (Chapter One), Beaumont (Chapter Two) outlines the stages of childhood which (rather than chronological age) govern the scheme of development reflected in Athenian iconography: birth and infancy, prepubescent childhood, pubescent youth. Beginning in the late sixth century, both later stages are subdivided for boys, the earlier for girls as well; in another hundred years older and younger pubescent girls are also visibly distinguished. These stages are signalled by a varied set of indicators: body shape and size, the location and length of hair, dress, gestures, attributes such as toys and pets, the relations between figures. Crude as they are, these visual cues often mask or deny distinctions, all the more since the gap between the adult male citizen and other groups, including children, was much greater than other discriminations. So both children and slaves are shown small, younger boys on vases may be painted with white like females, youths sometimes mourn like women and sometimes exhibit masculine self-control. In general, however, gender separation becomes starker with age and boys become more manlike as they approach maturity. Biological changes are tracked, not always precisely, by the progression of a ritual and social calendar. Infancy ends with the child’s first active participation in public cult, the Anthesteria; this is the occasion for the gifts of miniature wine-jugs, choes, though the children portrayed on them sometimes still crawl like babies. The cutting of hair at the koureion is a maturation rite for boys which likely lags biological and numerological puberty (at 14) by a couple of years. As for girls, since their own biological maturation guaranteed their readiness for marriage, more care was taken to identify that transition for them (by breasts, longer hair, a special mantle). Beaumont devotes two long chapters in Part II to this “juvenile life course,” from “Birth and Infancy” (45–103) to “The Developing Child” (104–206), before adding a clear and concise conclusion (207–211). Throughout, Beaumont examines individual images and their contexts with scrupulous care and collects countless comparanda in her 681 footnotes. Here are some of Beaumont’s noteworthy suggestions. Breastfeeding, almost absent from Athenian pots, is found on those from Etruria and other western sites and is very common among terracotta figurines (46, 54); also unusually, mortal childbirth turns up only from the late fifth/early fourth century, and then only in commemorative funereal or votive contexts (46–48). Swaddled infants appear in sculpted reliefs and terracotta; vase painters prefer to leave their arms free to gesture (50). On pots, mortal fathers, BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 201 unlike gods, do not interact with their babies, “since affective relationships between men and their young children did not constitute an element in the social construction of the ideal citizen male’s identity” (60). (A gravestone with an adult male and a young child, is viewed as an exceptional vignette of Athenian private life [97]). Beaumont supports many of Sanne Houby-Nielsen’s conclusions about children’s burials and the role of women in providing their grave goods, but does not agree that the relative scarcity of fourth-century evidence testifies to a new lack of interest; it is in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207