MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4205156453 · doi:10.1353/phx.2019.0007

Music, Text, and Culture in Ancient Greece by Tom Phillips Armand D'Angour

2019· article· en· W4205156453 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eleonora Rocconi

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhoenix · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClassical Antiquity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChorusChoirMusicalLiteratureSingingLamentArtHistoryVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

402 PHOENIX Trojan Women (100–139) presents a situation where choreia is “a symbol of the civic strength and stability that has now been destroyed” (101). The play stresses the absence of choreia following the destruction of Troy, in a performed paradox where the singing chorus lament the music they have lost, and Cassandra must sing a hymenaios for herself without a chorus (113–116). Musical innovation and features of New Music stress novelty in a postchoral existence, leading to antiphonal lament. For Weiss, this slows the action of the play, halting the plot’s forward momentum, just as in Electra music was used to drive the audience towards the matricide. Helen (140–190) instead binds its title character to the chorus, as its chorēgos (141; though there is some slippage between this function as chorus trainer and producer and that of the koryphaios, the chorus leader, as a fellow performer with the chorus). Weiss offers an insightful reading of choral song as a choral identity unfolds for Helen over the course of the play. The female voice emerges from that of the monstrous Sirens (145–156) and the natural (and mythic) nightingale (158–167) and develops towards Spartan choreia. This discussion prompted me to wonder to what extent choral dance in Athens would be characterized by the Athenian male performers as specifically Spartan during the Peloponnesian War. The opposite trajectory emerges in the discussion of Iphigenia in Aulis (191–231), as the parodos starts with panhellenic choreia but concludes on Iphigenia herself, as a single performer (231). The wedding in the plot leads to a song with characteristics of the hymenaios (211–224), but as with Cassandra in Trojan Women, the marriage anticipated is not realized. As in the previous plays examined, what seems important in these choral songs is a sense of “doubleness, the mix of alterity and proximity” (242). The mousikē these choruses isolate provide a richer dramatic world, because the songs all point to a larger musical reality. As a brief discussion in the conclusion to the book notes, this is not the case in Bacchae (241–246), where Dionysiac choral performance points directly to Dionysiac choral performance both on- and off-stage. This discussion represents an important coda to the larger study, because it rightly notes that the approach is not some master key for interpreting tragedy (or even just later Euripides). The value of Weiss’s readings emerges from the unique circumstances of musical presentation in each play. There is so much to like in this book, and a brief review cannot summarize it adequately . Weiss explores the appropriation of musical genres such as dithyramb into tragic song (9–10, 76–87), and the juxtaposition of aulos music with other musical instruments, such as the syrinx (205–210). Weiss regularly points to fragmentary plays to enrich her analysis, and arguments are clearly signposted throughout. The Music of Tragedy illuminates the musical imagery in four Euripidean plays and it should provoke new readings of choral song in tragedy. University of British Columbia C. W. Marshall Music, Text, and Culture in Ancient Greece. Edited by Tom Phillips and Armand D'Angour. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. Pp. 294, 6 blackand -white figures. The relationship between ancient Greek music and poetry has been attracting growing interest in recent scholarship. Besides the enduring fortune of disciplines like metrics, which has always exercised a great power of seduction over philologists, several other BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 403 aspects of ancient mousikē—virtually ignored until a few years ago—have recently been taken into consideration (e.g., scalar systems, instrumental practices, and so on). This has led many scholars in the field of classics to approach ancient “literary” texts with more awareness of their performative components. This volume, whose contributions originated in two events—a workshop and a conference —held in Oxford between 2013 and 2014, explores the different possible ways of dealing with such a fascinating, yet tricky, topic. The ten chapters here collected, jointly edited by Tom Phillips and Armand D’Angour, analyse a wide range of texts (in terms of chronology and genre) from different perspectives, demonstrating the liveliness of modern debates on these topics. Taken...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,270
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,554

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhoenixMême sujetClassical Antiquity StudiesTravaux en français237 207