MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205156453 · doi:10.1353/phx.2019.0007

Music, Text, and Culture in Ancient Greece by Tom Phillips Armand D'Angour

2019· article· en· W4205156453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eleonora Rocconi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChorusChoirMusicalLiteratureSingingLamentArtHistoryVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

402 PHOENIX Trojan Women (100–139) presents a situation where choreia is “a symbol of the civic strength and stability that has now been destroyed” (101). The play stresses the absence of choreia following the destruction of Troy, in a performed paradox where the singing chorus lament the music they have lost, and Cassandra must sing a hymenaios for herself without a chorus (113–116). Musical innovation and features of New Music stress novelty in a postchoral existence, leading to antiphonal lament. For Weiss, this slows the action of the play, halting the plot’s forward momentum, just as in Electra music was used to drive the audience towards the matricide. Helen (140–190) instead binds its title character to the chorus, as its chorēgos (141; though there is some slippage between this function as chorus trainer and producer and that of the koryphaios, the chorus leader, as a fellow performer with the chorus). Weiss offers an insightful reading of choral song as a choral identity unfolds for Helen over the course of the play. The female voice emerges from that of the monstrous Sirens (145–156) and the natural (and mythic) nightingale (158–167) and develops towards Spartan choreia. This discussion prompted me to wonder to what extent choral dance in Athens would be characterized by the Athenian male performers as specifically Spartan during the Peloponnesian War. The opposite trajectory emerges in the discussion of Iphigenia in Aulis (191–231), as the parodos starts with panhellenic choreia but concludes on Iphigenia herself, as a single performer (231). The wedding in the plot leads to a song with characteristics of the hymenaios (211–224), but as with Cassandra in Trojan Women, the marriage anticipated is not realized. As in the previous plays examined, what seems important in these choral songs is a sense of “doubleness, the mix of alterity and proximity” (242). The mousikē these choruses isolate provide a richer dramatic world, because the songs all point to a larger musical reality. As a brief discussion in the conclusion to the book notes, this is not the case in Bacchae (241–246), where Dionysiac choral performance points directly to Dionysiac choral performance both on- and off-stage. This discussion represents an important coda to the larger study, because it rightly notes that the approach is not some master key for interpreting tragedy (or even just later Euripides). The value of Weiss’s readings emerges from the unique circumstances of musical presentation in each play. There is so much to like in this book, and a brief review cannot summarize it adequately . Weiss explores the appropriation of musical genres such as dithyramb into tragic song (9–10, 76–87), and the juxtaposition of aulos music with other musical instruments, such as the syrinx (205–210). Weiss regularly points to fragmentary plays to enrich her analysis, and arguments are clearly signposted throughout. The Music of Tragedy illuminates the musical imagery in four Euripidean plays and it should provoke new readings of choral song in tragedy. University of British Columbia C. W. Marshall Music, Text, and Culture in Ancient Greece. Edited by Tom Phillips and Armand D'Angour. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. Pp. 294, 6 blackand -white figures. The relationship between ancient Greek music and poetry has been attracting growing interest in recent scholarship. Besides the enduring fortune of disciplines like metrics, which has always exercised a great power of seduction over philologists, several other BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 403 aspects of ancient mousikē—virtually ignored until a few years ago—have recently been taken into consideration (e.g., scalar systems, instrumental practices, and so on). This has led many scholars in the field of classics to approach ancient “literary” texts with more awareness of their performative components. This volume, whose contributions originated in two events—a workshop and a conference —held in Oxford between 2013 and 2014, explores the different possible ways of dealing with such a fascinating, yet tricky, topic. The ten chapters here collected, jointly edited by Tom Phillips and Armand D’Angour, analyse a wide range of texts (in terms of chronology and genre) from different perspectives, demonstrating the liveliness of modern debates on these topics. Taken...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207