A Historical Greek Reader, Mycenaean to the Koiné by Stephen Colvin
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS A Historical Greek Reader, Mycenaean to the Koine\ By Stephen Colvin. Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press. 2007. Pp. xx,301. This book is intended to be a history of the ancient Greek language for university levelstudents.It joins a smalllistof recendypublishedbooks on thehistory ofGreek that areaimed at classicists who have no or litdelinguistic training. As aReader,Colvin's book is essentially a collection of illustrative texts accompanied by translations and linguistic commentary, but it is unique in the field and makes a happy complement to narrative historiesof the language such asG. Horrocks, GreekA History ofthe Language and Its Speakers(rev.ed.,Oxford 2010), F.-R. Adrados,A History ofthe Greek Language (Leiden 2005), and tomulti-authored works such asA.-F. Christidis (ed.),A History of Ancient Greek^Cambridge 2007) andE. Bakker (ed.),BlackwellsCompanion tothe AncientGreek Language (Oxford2010), toname fourof therecent best. The book falls into two halves. The first contains a short grammatical introduction thatbreezes through a longlinguistic history:theIndo-European background, Mycenaean Greek,Greek inthealphabetic period,dialectdiversity, literary languages,andpost-classical prose. The notes are very concise but serviceable, and they provide a working grammar that is referred tomany times in the subsequent notes attached to the text selections. Students with no linguistic background will find these seventy pages approachableand, hopefully, an inducement to further, more detailed study. The terse presentation occasionally has its drawbacks, however. There is neither a discussion of reconstructed Proto-Indo-European nor even the phonemic inventory from which Greek developed. One repercussion of this is that Colvin never discusses the palatovelar series of obstruents *?, *g, and he reconstructs without themthroughout hisbook, forexample,*genhy for*genh\- (200), *wrg-for*ivrg (204), htg-for *hjg- (205), *sejf-for *segh-(208, 211, 240). Some otherminor details are disputable: pace Colvin, I would argue that there is good evidence that Grassmann's Law did not operate inMycenaean texts (9), and that a convincing explanation for the double outcome of initial*yhas been advanced (but is ignoredhere, 10). I find the Schulze-Sommer model for the spread of movable nu, which goes unmentioned here, far more convincing than Kurylowicz's (38). Part Two is a collection of texts, each of which is accompanied by a translation and linguistic commentary. This part of the book falls into three subsections: Mycenaean Greek, dialect inscriptions from the eighth to the third centuries, and literary texts from Homer to the koine. I would have enjoyed more Mycenaean texts; Colvin only includes six (two from Knossos, four from Pylos), and they are all very familiar, ready-to-hand, and amplynotated in works likeJ. T. Hooker's LinearB:An Introduction (Bristol1980). There are about sixty-five dialect selectionsin thebook. All of themajor dialects are coveredandColvin has includedtextsfroma chronologicalrangeaswide as the eighth centuryto the late thirdcenturyb.c Although the collectionof textsisnot especially unique, since most of these inscriptions (overforty) will be familiarfromcollectionssuch asC. D. Buck, The Greek D/ator (Chicago 1955),L. H. Jeffery, TheLocal Scripts of Archaic Greece (Oxford 1990), orR. Meiggs andD. Lewis (eds.),A SelectionofGreek Historical Inscriptions to the End ofthe FifthCenturyB.C.(Oxford 1969), I suspect thiswill prove nevertheless tobe the most usefulsectionof thebook justforits good translations ofdialect PHOENIX, VOL. 63 (2009) 3-4. 385 386 PHOENIX inscriptions. So,while thisbook isdifferent in itsfocusand isnot nearlyas inclusiveas an old standbylikeBuck, the readingsand bibliographyforthe textsitoffersaremore up-to-date and come with fine translations and notes; itwill be a very welcome addition to every Greek Dialects course. The selections of literary texts, more thanthirty, arearranged partly bygenre (epic,Ionic elegyand iambus, Aeolic monody,Doric chorus,lyric monody) and partly by chronology: the classical world (Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Euripides, Herodotus, Hippocratic corpus, Thucydides,Xenophon), hellenisticpoetry(Theocritus, Callimachus), post-classicalprose (Septuagint,Polybius,New Testament, Lucian, Galen). Students should find most of thesereadingsquite entertaining(e.g.,Hector beforehis duelwithAchilles in theIliad, theCologne epode of Archilochus, Semonides onwomen,Thucydides on thedebate over Mytilene, Lucian's fraudulent professor and his tips on duping an audience, etc.). In spite of this, it seems to me that this section is perhaps not as well-suited to the format of the book as are the others. These literary texts and good commentaries on them are readily available elsewhere. Furthermore, the text...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».