MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205225690 · doi:10.1353/phx.2009.0014

A Historical Greek Reader, Mycenaean to the Koiné by Stephen Colvin

2009· article· en· W4205225690 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shane Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAncient GreekClassicsNarrativeHistoryGrammarGreek languageLiteratureArtLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS A Historical Greek Reader, Mycenaean to the Koine\ By Stephen Colvin. Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press. 2007. Pp. xx,301. This book is intended to be a history of the ancient Greek language for university levelstudents.It joins a smalllistof recendypublishedbooks on thehistory ofGreek that areaimed at classicists who have no or litdelinguistic training. As aReader,Colvin's book is essentially a collection of illustrative texts accompanied by translations and linguistic commentary, but it is unique in the field and makes a happy complement to narrative historiesof the language such asG. Horrocks, GreekA History ofthe Language and Its Speakers(rev.ed.,Oxford 2010), F.-R. Adrados,A History ofthe Greek Language (Leiden 2005), and tomulti-authored works such asA.-F. Christidis (ed.),A History of Ancient Greek^Cambridge 2007) andE. Bakker (ed.),BlackwellsCompanion tothe AncientGreek Language (Oxford2010), toname fourof therecent best. The book falls into two halves. The first contains a short grammatical introduction thatbreezes through a longlinguistic history:theIndo-European background, Mycenaean Greek,Greek inthealphabetic period,dialectdiversity, literary languages,andpost-classical prose. The notes are very concise but serviceable, and they provide a working grammar that is referred tomany times in the subsequent notes attached to the text selections. Students with no linguistic background will find these seventy pages approachableand, hopefully, an inducement to further, more detailed study. The terse presentation occasionally has its drawbacks, however. There is neither a discussion of reconstructed Proto-Indo-European nor even the phonemic inventory from which Greek developed. One repercussion of this is that Colvin never discusses the palatovelar series of obstruents *?, *g, and he reconstructs without themthroughout hisbook, forexample,*genhy for*genh\- (200), *wrg-for*ivrg (204), htg-for *hjg- (205), *sejf-for *segh-(208, 211, 240). Some otherminor details are disputable: pace Colvin, I would argue that there is good evidence that Grassmann's Law did not operate inMycenaean texts (9), and that a convincing explanation for the double outcome of initial*yhas been advanced (but is ignoredhere, 10). I find the Schulze-Sommer model for the spread of movable nu, which goes unmentioned here, far more convincing than Kurylowicz's (38). Part Two is a collection of texts, each of which is accompanied by a translation and linguistic commentary. This part of the book falls into three subsections: Mycenaean Greek, dialect inscriptions from the eighth to the third centuries, and literary texts from Homer to the koine. I would have enjoyed more Mycenaean texts; Colvin only includes six (two from Knossos, four from Pylos), and they are all very familiar, ready-to-hand, and amplynotated in works likeJ. T. Hooker's LinearB:An Introduction (Bristol1980). There are about sixty-five dialect selectionsin thebook. All of themajor dialects are coveredandColvin has includedtextsfroma chronologicalrangeaswide as the eighth centuryto the late thirdcenturyb.c Although the collectionof textsisnot especially unique, since most of these inscriptions (overforty) will be familiarfromcollectionssuch asC. D. Buck, The Greek D/ator (Chicago 1955),L. H. Jeffery, TheLocal Scripts of Archaic Greece (Oxford 1990), orR. Meiggs andD. Lewis (eds.),A SelectionofGreek Historical Inscriptions to the End ofthe FifthCenturyB.C.(Oxford 1969), I suspect thiswill prove nevertheless tobe the most usefulsectionof thebook justforits good translations ofdialect PHOENIX, VOL. 63 (2009) 3-4. 385 386 PHOENIX inscriptions. So,while thisbook isdifferent in itsfocusand isnot nearlyas inclusiveas an old standbylikeBuck, the readingsand bibliographyforthe textsitoffersaremore up-to-date and come with fine translations and notes; itwill be a very welcome addition to every Greek Dialects course. The selections of literary texts, more thanthirty, arearranged partly bygenre (epic,Ionic elegyand iambus, Aeolic monody,Doric chorus,lyric monody) and partly by chronology: the classical world (Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Euripides, Herodotus, Hippocratic corpus, Thucydides,Xenophon), hellenisticpoetry(Theocritus, Callimachus), post-classicalprose (Septuagint,Polybius,New Testament, Lucian, Galen). Students should find most of thesereadingsquite entertaining(e.g.,Hector beforehis duelwithAchilles in theIliad, theCologne epode of Archilochus, Semonides onwomen,Thucydides on thedebate over Mytilene, Lucian's fraudulent professor and his tips on duping an audience, etc.). In spite of this, it seems to me that this section is perhaps not as well-suited to the format of the book as are the others. These literary texts and good commentaries on them are readily available elsewhere. Furthermore, the text...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicLinguistics and language evolutionFrench-language works237,207