OP08 The effects of maintenance therapy with upadacitinib on abdominal pain, bowel urgency, and fatigue in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 3 U-ACHIEVE maintenance results
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Abdominal pain (AP), bowel urgency (BU), and fatigue are debilitating symptoms that reduce quality of life in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). Results from two Phase 3 induction trials (U-ACHIEVE induction [NCT02819635] and U-ACCOMPLISH [NCT03653026]) showed significant improvements in AP, BU, and fatigue following induction with upadacitinib (UPA) in patients with active UC who had previously failed conventional or biologic therapy. We evaluated the effects of 52-week UPA maintenance treatment on AP, BU, and fatigue in patients who achieved a clinical response after induction. Methods Four hundred fifty-one patients who achieved a clinical response after 8 weeks of induction with UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) were enrolled in the U-ACHIEVE maintenance study and were re-randomised 1:1:1 to UPA 15 mg QD (n=148), UPA 30 mg QD (n=154), or placebo (PBO) QD (n=149). Endpoints in this analysis were the percentage of patients who reported no AP or no BU at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 20, 28, 36 and 52, respectively, and the change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–F) from induction baseline to Weeks 0 and 52 in the maintenance study. Patients recorded AP and BU daily via an electronic, handheld device. Lastly, the percentage of patients reporting a clinically meaningful within person change (MWPC), defined as ≥5-point increase in FACIT-F score from induction baseline, and normalization of fatigue, defined as a FACIT-F score >40 points, were determined at Weeks 0 and 52. Results Significantly more patients reported no AP at Week 8 for UPA 15 mg vs PBO (60.8% vs 48.3%, p<0.05, Figure 1) and at Week 12 for UPA 30 mg vs PBO (59.7% vs 43.6%, p<0.01); significant differences were maintained through Week 52 (15 mg: 45.9%; 30 mg: 55.3% vs PBO: 20.8%, p<0.001). For no BU reported, significant differences vs PBO were observed with UPA 30 mg at Week 4 (68.8% vs 54.4%, p<0.05, Figure 2) and with UPA 15 mg at Week 8 (64.9% vs 49.7%, p<0.01) and were maintained through Week 52 (15 mg: 56.1%; 30 mg: 63.6% vs PBO: 17.4%, p<0.001). A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved MWPC in FACIT-F with both UPA 15 mg (55.4%) and UPA 30 mg (58.8%) compared with PBO (35.1%; p<0.001) at Week 52. In addition, a greater percentage of UPA-treated patients achieved normalization of fatigue (52.0% and 55.7% for UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg, respectively) vs PBO (35.7%) at Week 52 (p<0.01). Conclusion In patients with moderately to severely active UC who responded to UPA 45 mg induction treatment, significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported AP, BU, and fatigue achieved during induction were sustained through 52 weeks of UPA 15 mg or 30 mg maintenance treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».