The Ethical Obligation of the State to Hear and Address Indigenous Claims for Justice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
What are the implications of this profound power disparity in our struggles for land and freedom?Does it require that we vacate the field of state negotiations and participation entirely?Of course not.Settler-colonialism has rendered us a radical minority in our own homelands, and this necessitates that we continue to engage with the state's legal and political system.(Coulthard 2014, 179) In the very last paragraph of his book Red Skin White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition, Glen Coulthard arrives at the problem of the necessity to engage with the state.It is at this location of the analysis that I begin my investigation.How does the state listen to and engage with Indigenous peoples on issues of concern to them?How does the state respond in a relationship of profound power imbalance?What ethical moves can the state make to address the power imbalance in its relationships with Indigenous peoples?In this project, I listen to a range of Indigenous voices to begin to understand what justice means to them by listening to their experiences in seeking justice from the state as a structure that represents the majority of Canadians, who are non-Indigenous.I interview two senior government officials who largely understand the challenges of trying to address Indigenous justice claims within a large system.I also examine the state mechanisms of inquiries and commissions designed to listen to specific justice concerns and the state's reception of their recommendations and calls to action.Throughout, I apply Indigenous scholarship to better understand the nature of Indigenous justice, and feminist relational approaches as a tool to understand the relations of power within the structures that reinforce historical oppression, because those structures have not changed substantially from their original colonial design.With this approach, I begin the work of outlining the types of strategic moves that are necessary to shift the relations of power between Indigenous peoples and the state in Canada, such that Indigenous justice claims can be heard and ethically addressed.iii Impetus: Who am I and what is my motivation?My name is Seetal Kaur Sunga.I am a non-Indigenous woman whose family arrived in British Columbia around 1905 from Punjab, India, where British colonial powers had inflicted damage in an imperial-colonial setting.Both the migration and the political history of my ancestral family as activists against the British Raj are intertwined with imperial colonial history.My family arrived as labourers and fought racism to stay as settlers.We benefitted and continue to benefit from settler colonialism in Canada.My heart is connected to the lands where I have lived throughout Canada.I am committed to using my gifts to seek justice with Indigenous peoples in Canada who are co-constituted with the land, while acknowledging my position as a beneficiary of settler colonialism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».