The Ethical Obligation of the State to Hear and Address Indigenous Claims for Justice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What are the implications of this profound power disparity in our struggles for land and freedom?Does it require that we vacate the field of state negotiations and participation entirely?Of course not.Settler-colonialism has rendered us a radical minority in our own homelands, and this necessitates that we continue to engage with the state's legal and political system.(Coulthard 2014, 179) In the very last paragraph of his book Red Skin White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition, Glen Coulthard arrives at the problem of the necessity to engage with the state.It is at this location of the analysis that I begin my investigation.How does the state listen to and engage with Indigenous peoples on issues of concern to them?How does the state respond in a relationship of profound power imbalance?What ethical moves can the state make to address the power imbalance in its relationships with Indigenous peoples?In this project, I listen to a range of Indigenous voices to begin to understand what justice means to them by listening to their experiences in seeking justice from the state as a structure that represents the majority of Canadians, who are non-Indigenous.I interview two senior government officials who largely understand the challenges of trying to address Indigenous justice claims within a large system.I also examine the state mechanisms of inquiries and commissions designed to listen to specific justice concerns and the state's reception of their recommendations and calls to action.Throughout, I apply Indigenous scholarship to better understand the nature of Indigenous justice, and feminist relational approaches as a tool to understand the relations of power within the structures that reinforce historical oppression, because those structures have not changed substantially from their original colonial design.With this approach, I begin the work of outlining the types of strategic moves that are necessary to shift the relations of power between Indigenous peoples and the state in Canada, such that Indigenous justice claims can be heard and ethically addressed.iii Impetus: Who am I and what is my motivation?My name is Seetal Kaur Sunga.I am a non-Indigenous woman whose family arrived in British Columbia around 1905 from Punjab, India, where British colonial powers had inflicted damage in an imperial-colonial setting.Both the migration and the political history of my ancestral family as activists against the British Raj are intertwined with imperial colonial history.My family arrived as labourers and fought racism to stay as settlers.We benefitted and continue to benefit from settler colonialism in Canada.My heart is connected to the lands where I have lived throughout Canada.I am committed to using my gifts to seek justice with Indigenous peoples in Canada who are co-constituted with the land, while acknowledging my position as a beneficiary of settler colonialism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".