The experiences of apathy in people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment and their carers: A qualitative interview study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Apathy, defined as reduced goal‐directed activity, social engagement and emotion, is highly prevalent in dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and has important consequences for the individuals that experience it and those who care for them. However, the lived experiences of this population is not well understood. This study aimed to explore how people with dementia and MCI and their carers experience apathy. Method People with early dementia and MCI living in four geographical areas of England were invited to take part in a qualitative interview. All participants had capacity to give informed consent. In‐depth semi‐structured interviews were conducted with fourteen people with dementia or MCI and carer dyads, and two participants without a carer present. Patient’s mean age was 76 years, Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 20, and five were female. Interviews, conducted in the participant’s homes, lasted between 38 and 115 minutes, were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Result Findings were organised into two connected themes: ‘The struggle of everyday life is not worth it’ and ‘Threatened identity: changing sense of self and place in the world’. Participants’ everyday lives required more effort and were a “struggle” due to cognitive and physical impairments. This could make the effort to engage, act, and maintain interest not worth it, resulting in apparent apathy. Motivation to stay engaged despite difficulty was influenced by the accessibility of opportunities, and support from others. Participants views of their (past) autonomous and competent self were challenged by the changes they experienced. Participants sometimes focused on their present capabilities, and did what they were still able, whilst others found changes difficult to accept and withdrew from situations which challenged their sense of self. Conclusion Apathy is experienced as a response to the everyday difficulties participants faced, which could be exacerbated by lack of support and opportunities. This is in contrast to the popular view of apathy as a symptom of neurodegenerative changes that occur in dementia. Our findings echo those of qualitative research in people with Parkinson’s Disease (Simpson et al., 2014).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».