Notice bibliographique
Résumé
FigureFigureSometimes those of us living and working in the United States think of the physician assistant/associate (PA) profession as a purely American invention; however, the truth is that outside the United States, a vibrant PA profession has existed for some time and is continuing to spread across the world. As recently as 2018, nations besides the United States that had formally introduced the PA concept include Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Ghana, India, Ireland, Israel, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, South Africa, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.1 And as the profession has grown and expanded internationally, scholars are documenting those experiences. Many of the resulting articles are published in journals that may be difficult for many of us to access, and as a result we are not even aware they were published, denying us the opportunity to learn about the PA experience outside of the United States. So that JAAPA readers can more easily access articles that describe the international PA experience, we have created a new department, Global Insights. This new department will be dedicated to publishing articles of interest to JAAPA readers that describe the PA profession beyond the United States. One never knows where the roots of our profession might take hold or already run deep. The PA profession strives to address how the 7.5 billion people in the world are being and will be cared for globally. The new Global Insights department will illustrate the PA movement beyond the United States and archive its history. The PA profession in the United States, created by physicians, is both predated and postdated by PAs and their analogues around the world. The PA and PA analogue movement is well under way globally, and our new department will provide history, context, original research, status updates, and other interesting aspects of the PA profession from countries and regions worldwide. This month's launch of this new department starts the process of providing a repository of articles from countries with a PA profession, articles that describe a country's history, its PA educational programs, deployment of graduates and their practice settings, as well as their national PA prescience and thoughts on the future. Additionally, these articles will add to the current and future body of knowledge about the global profession, and more importantly, the information published will leave an indexed publication archive, making it useful to policy makers and other interested parties. This issue features our first Global Insights article, “Physician associates in the UK: Development, status, and future” by Kate Straughton, MSc, PA-R, and colleagues, all of whom serve as PA faculty in the United Kingdom. The authors describe the history of the PA profession in the United Kingdom, including its roots, development, development of regulations, title protection, development of educational programs, and the profession's growth. The article describes the profession's birth in 1980, when a PA student from the United States was placed in a general practice setting, leading to the establishment of demonstration projects using PAs from the United States. The profession matured as these demonstration projects led to government support for the development of PAs and establishment of an educational system in the United Kingdom to address healthcare workforce shortages. The authors document in detail the trials and tribulations of establishing a new profession within the confines of a nationalized healthcare system with strong historical physician and nursing roles. The profession's successes and challenges in the United Kingdom will sound familiar to those knowledgeable about the history of the PA profession in the United States. We look forward to providing JAAPA readers with articles that will remind them of the long and interesting worldwide history of the PA profession and its vibrant global growth. We also look forward to the opportunity to illustrate for readers that nations where the profession is being considered or is established have supported the PA profession for a wide variety of reasons specific to each country, but most commonly to provide healthcare to more of their citizens. Lastly, we look forward to working with authors from around the world who will share with us their perspective of the profession we have in common. We hope you enjoy Global Insights.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».