MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210816717 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2008.0489

The Letters of Stephen Leacock by David Staines, Barbara Nimmo, Stephen Leacock

2008· article· en· W4210816717 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stacy Gillis

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVeblen goodPoliticsMedalClassicsHistoryArt historySchools of economic thoughtLawPolitical scienceEconomicsNeoclassical economics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1120 Reviews The Letters ofStephen Leacock. Ed. byDAVID STAINESwith BARBARA NIMMO. Oxford: OxfordUniversityPress. 2005. xi+528pp. Ig9.99. ISBN978-o-i9-54o869-o. Stephen Leacock does not getmuch scholarly attention, which is somewhat surpris ing considering his prolific output of over sixty books and hundreds of articles and pamphlets and his place in Canadian literary history. He was born in England in I869, but his familymoved toOntario when he was six years old. After a penurious upbringing, he graduated from theUniversity ofToronto before obtaining a Ph.D. inpolitical science from theUniversity ofChicago, working with Thorstein Veblen. He later stated that 'themeaning of [thePh.D. was] that the recipient of instruction is examined for the last time inhis life,and ispronounced completely full.After this,no new ideas can be imparted tohim' (Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town (Toronto: Bell & Cockburn, I9I2), p. ix).He took up a position in theDepartment of Economics and Political Science atMcGill University where he remained forhis entire academic career (including being head of department forover thirtyyears). Although perhaps best known today for the Stephen Leacock Medal forHumour, which has been awarded yearly since I947 to the best humorous book by a Canadian author, he was equally heralded during his lifetime forhis humorous writing as well as his work on political economy. His firstbook, Elements ofPolitical Science (I906), was a standard university textbook and was translated into almost twenty languages, and he continued to publish widely regarded books in political economy. In short, his was an excellent scholarly career. To supplement his earnings as a scholar, how ever, Leacock turned to humorous writing. In I9IO he published Literary Lapses, which was followed by Nonsense Novels in I91 I, a parody of the popular genres of literature, and bywhat iswidely perceived as his masterpiece, Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, in I9I2. Wodehousian at times-'Lord Ronald [. . .] flung himself upon his horse and rode madly off in all directions' (Nonsense Novels (New York: John Lane, I9I I), P. 73)-Leacock was one of the best-selling authors inCanada in the firsthalf of the twentieth century.His interest in small-town lifehas impacted on such laterauthors asAlice Munro and Garrison Keillor. His literaryoutput remained high throughout his life:he continued toproduce works on political economy, comic sketches and novels, studies ofhumour-his Humour: Its Theory and Technique (I 93 5) was highly regarded-as well as travelnarratives and acclaimed biographies ofMark Twain (1932) and Charles Dickens (I933). This makes it all themore surprising that he has not received much critical at tention. There has been the occasional biography-David Legate, Stephen Leacock: A Biography (Toronto: Doubleday, I978); James Doyle, Stephen Leacock: The Sage ofOrillia (Toronto: ECW Press, I992)-and bibliography-Carl Spadoni, A Bib liography of Stephen Leacock (Toronto: ECW Press, I998); now updated as An e Bibliography of Stephen Leacock, 2nd edn (Shelburne, ON: The Battered Silicon Dispatch Box, 2004)-as well as several earnest studies of his humorous technique Gerald Lynch, Stephen Leacock: Humour and Humanity (Kingston, ON: McGill Queen's University Press, I988); Zdenka Vavrova-Rejskova, Stephen Leacock and theArt ofHumour (Prague: Univerzita Karlova, I987). It is only David Staines, however, who has sustained the field of Leacockian studies in depth. His earlier collection-Stephen Leacock: A Reappraisal (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, I986)-is complemented nicely by this collection of letters.The work of some fifteen years, it assembles awide-ranging and humane account of Leacock (aided, in part, by Barbara Nimmo, Leacock's niece). This is a superb selection ofLeacock's letters, ranging fromhis early childhood to just amonth before his death from throat can cer in 1944. The ten sections each possess a useful introduction and the letters are meticulously annotated. Illustrated with original photographs, this selection of letters provides a crucial personal account of one of Canada's top early twentieth-century MLR, I03.4, 2oo8 II21 writers. Leacock deserves far more than posterity has so fargiven him and this col lection goes some way to rectifyingthis injustice. NEWCASTLEUNIVERSITY STACYGILLIS Miraculous Rhymes: The Writing ofGautier de Coinci. By TONY HUNT. (Gallica, 8) Cambridge: Brewer. 2007. Viii+2I2pp. ?50. ISBN 978-I-84384-I26-5. Tony Hunt claims thathis is the firstbook...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,248
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Modern Language ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207