MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210816717 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2008.0489

The Letters of Stephen Leacock by David Staines, Barbara Nimmo, Stephen Leacock

2008· article· en· W4210816717 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stacy Gillis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeblen goodPoliticsMedalClassicsHistoryArt historySchools of economic thoughtLawPolitical scienceEconomicsNeoclassical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1120 Reviews The Letters ofStephen Leacock. Ed. byDAVID STAINESwith BARBARA NIMMO. Oxford: OxfordUniversityPress. 2005. xi+528pp. Ig9.99. ISBN978-o-i9-54o869-o. Stephen Leacock does not getmuch scholarly attention, which is somewhat surpris ing considering his prolific output of over sixty books and hundreds of articles and pamphlets and his place in Canadian literary history. He was born in England in I869, but his familymoved toOntario when he was six years old. After a penurious upbringing, he graduated from theUniversity ofToronto before obtaining a Ph.D. inpolitical science from theUniversity ofChicago, working with Thorstein Veblen. He later stated that 'themeaning of [thePh.D. was] that the recipient of instruction is examined for the last time inhis life,and ispronounced completely full.After this,no new ideas can be imparted tohim' (Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town (Toronto: Bell & Cockburn, I9I2), p. ix).He took up a position in theDepartment of Economics and Political Science atMcGill University where he remained forhis entire academic career (including being head of department forover thirtyyears). Although perhaps best known today for the Stephen Leacock Medal forHumour, which has been awarded yearly since I947 to the best humorous book by a Canadian author, he was equally heralded during his lifetime forhis humorous writing as well as his work on political economy. His firstbook, Elements ofPolitical Science (I906), was a standard university textbook and was translated into almost twenty languages, and he continued to publish widely regarded books in political economy. In short, his was an excellent scholarly career. To supplement his earnings as a scholar, how ever, Leacock turned to humorous writing. In I9IO he published Literary Lapses, which was followed by Nonsense Novels in I91 I, a parody of the popular genres of literature, and bywhat iswidely perceived as his masterpiece, Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town, in I9I2. Wodehousian at times-'Lord Ronald [. . .] flung himself upon his horse and rode madly off in all directions' (Nonsense Novels (New York: John Lane, I9I I), P. 73)-Leacock was one of the best-selling authors inCanada in the firsthalf of the twentieth century.His interest in small-town lifehas impacted on such laterauthors asAlice Munro and Garrison Keillor. His literaryoutput remained high throughout his life:he continued toproduce works on political economy, comic sketches and novels, studies ofhumour-his Humour: Its Theory and Technique (I 93 5) was highly regarded-as well as travelnarratives and acclaimed biographies ofMark Twain (1932) and Charles Dickens (I933). This makes it all themore surprising that he has not received much critical at tention. There has been the occasional biography-David Legate, Stephen Leacock: A Biography (Toronto: Doubleday, I978); James Doyle, Stephen Leacock: The Sage ofOrillia (Toronto: ECW Press, I992)-and bibliography-Carl Spadoni, A Bib liography of Stephen Leacock (Toronto: ECW Press, I998); now updated as An e Bibliography of Stephen Leacock, 2nd edn (Shelburne, ON: The Battered Silicon Dispatch Box, 2004)-as well as several earnest studies of his humorous technique Gerald Lynch, Stephen Leacock: Humour and Humanity (Kingston, ON: McGill Queen's University Press, I988); Zdenka Vavrova-Rejskova, Stephen Leacock and theArt ofHumour (Prague: Univerzita Karlova, I987). It is only David Staines, however, who has sustained the field of Leacockian studies in depth. His earlier collection-Stephen Leacock: A Reappraisal (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, I986)-is complemented nicely by this collection of letters.The work of some fifteen years, it assembles awide-ranging and humane account of Leacock (aided, in part, by Barbara Nimmo, Leacock's niece). This is a superb selection ofLeacock's letters, ranging fromhis early childhood to just amonth before his death from throat can cer in 1944. The ten sections each possess a useful introduction and the letters are meticulously annotated. Illustrated with original photographs, this selection of letters provides a crucial personal account of one of Canada's top early twentieth-century MLR, I03.4, 2oo8 II21 writers. Leacock deserves far more than posterity has so fargiven him and this col lection goes some way to rectifyingthis injustice. NEWCASTLEUNIVERSITY STACYGILLIS Miraculous Rhymes: The Writing ofGautier de Coinci. By TONY HUNT. (Gallica, 8) Cambridge: Brewer. 2007. Viii+2I2pp. ?50. ISBN 978-I-84384-I26-5. Tony Hunt claims thathis is the firstbook...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207